Skip to content

A cross-sectional study of hair view in cancer patients and its potential impact on diagnosis and treatment behavior

A cross-sectional study of hair view in cancer patients and its potential impact on diagnosis and treatment behavior

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ITMCTR
Registry ID
ITMCTR2200006852
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2022-12-05
Start date
2022-12-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cancer

Interventions

Group of oncology patients:None

Sponsors

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The relevant research was conducted using questionnaire stars or paper questionnaires. The methodology is as follows: (1) General data questionnaire: On the basis of extensive references and consultation with TCM experts, a general data questionnaire for this study is formulated, including the age, gender, marital status, education and title of medical staff and tumor patients. (2) Nutrient scale: The nutrition scale is based on the domestic common malnutrition assessment standard for quantitative standard evaluation (such as PG-SGA), these scales are simple in content, highly operable, and have been verified by domestic and foreign studies with good reliability and validity. (3) "Hair" view scale: This scale is developed for this research situation, using a Likert 5-level score, 0 to 5 points represent no, very little identification, part of the identity, most of the recognition and all recognition. The evaluation criteria are that they do not agree with the concept of "hair", rarely agree with the concept of "hair", some agree with the view of "hair", most of them agree with the view of "hair", and very much agree with the view of "hair". (4) Sleep quality: Sleep quality is set to very good, better, poor, very poor 4 answer items according to the answer options, very good assignment of 4 points, better assignment of 3 points, poor assignment of 2 points, very poor assignment of 1 point.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactCao Dedong

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

caodedong123@whu.edu.cn+86 15927564963

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ITMCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026