Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of INtensive treatment versus standard treatment of COmpound DanshEn dripping pills in Refractory angina patients with incomplete revascularization (INCODER study): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled clinical trial

Efficacy and safety of INtensive treatment versus standard treatment of COmpound DanshEn dripping pills in Refractory angina patients with incomplete revascularization (INCODER study): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel controlled clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ITMCTR
Registry ID
ITMCTR2000003248
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-04-27
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

refractory angina with incomplete revascularization

Interventions

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18 to 85 years; 2. Had a history of coronary artery disease with refractory angina [Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II to III] despite optimal medical therapy for at least one month; Optimal medical therapy is defined as guideline-recommended treatment including secondary prevention and at least two antianginal drugs: one is nitrates, another is beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker, except for medication contraindications; 3. With incomplete revascularization (ICR). ICR is defined as the presence of >=1 lesion with visually estimated >=50% diameter stenosis in any coronary artery (including branch vessels) of >=2.0 mm in diameter, whether in the target vessel or in a nontarget vessel. In the case of a participant post-CABG, ICR is defined as the presence of >=1 lesion with visually estimated >=50% diameter stenosis in a nonbypassed epicardial vessel >=2.0 mm in diameter, or >=1 visually estimated >=50% diameter stenosis in a bypass graft supplying an otherwise nonrevascularized myocardial territory. 4. The ejection fraction >=30%; 5. Willing to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Acute coronary syndrome within 1 month or planned coronary revascularization during the study period; 2. Episode of transient ischemia attack, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 2 months; 3. Presence of neuromuscular, orthopedic or other non-cardiac condition such as severe peripheral artery disease, severe pulmonary hypertension and uncontrolled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma that prevents the patient from exercise testing on a cycle ergometer; 4. Patients with the following resting electrocardiographic abnormalities that might influence the interpretation of the termination of CPET: -Pre-excitation (Wolff-Parkinson-White) syndrome; -Electronically paced ventricular rhythm; -1 mm or more of resting ST depression -Complete left bundle-branch block or any interventricular conduction defect with a QRS duration greater than 120 ms 5. Uncontrolled symptomatic heart failure; 6. Moderate to severe symptomatic aortic stenosis; 7. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; 8. Acute myocarditis or pericarditis; 9. Active endocarditis; 10. Acute pulmonary embolism; 11. Suspected or known acute aortic dissection; 12. Severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg at screening) 13. Severe anemia (Hemoglobin < 60 g/L); 14. Active psychosis requiring anticonvulsant treatment; 15. Pregnant or lactating women. 16. Participation in other clinical studies within 30 days before the first visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the change in total exercise time from baseline to week 6;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The changes of VO2 at anaerobic threshold (ml/min/kg) from baseline to week 6;The changes of PETO2 at peak exercise (mmHg) from baseline to week 6;The changes of the proportion of patients experiencing an improvement of >=1 CCS angina classes from baseline to week 6;The changes of VE/VCO2 slope from baseline to week 6;The changes of O2 pulse at peak exercise (mL/beat) from baseline to week 6;The changes of Peak VO2 (ml/min/kg) from baseline to week 6;The changes of PETCO2 at peak exercise (mmHg) from baseline to week 6;The changes of the proportion of patients experiencing an improvement of >=2 CCS angina classes from baseline to week 6;The changes of ?VO2/?work-rate (ml/min/W) from baseline to week 6;The changes of angina frequency from baseline to week 6;The changes of the Seattle Angina Questionnaires scores (subdivided into 5 dimensions including physical limitation, anginal stability, anginal frequency, treatment satisfaction and disease perception) from baseline to week 6;The changes of Peak work rate (W) from baseline to week 6;The changes of plasma C-reactive protein, homocysteine and NT-proBNP from baseline to week 6;The changes of Peak METs from baseline to week 6;The changes of VO2 at anaerobic threshold (ml/min) from baseline to week 6;The changes of Peak VO2 (ml/min) from baseline to week 6;The changes of frequency of nitroglycerine use from baseline to week 6;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYugang Dong

The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

dongxg@mail.sysu.edu.cn+86 020-87755766-8140

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ITMCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026