Skip to content

Piezoelectric drills for dental implants

Comparative evaluation of piezosurgery versus conventional surgery in dental implants

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN99951388
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-04-09
Start date
2016-12-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental implant Oral Health

Interventions

Thirty patients with two edentulous sites, at least one of which was in the posterior mandibular region, were treated sequentially at two sites: Site A, where implant placement was conducted using pie

Sponsors

Army Hospital Research and Referral
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18 - 50 years 2. Edentulous site in posterior mandibular region 3. Availability of adequate bone volume without any surgical modification

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. H/o extraction <6 months prior to placement of implant 2. Immunocompromised individual 3. Previous irradiation treatment in head and neck area 4. H/o periodontal disease (active/treated) 5. H/o bone metabolic disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Bone density measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan at baseline, 6 and 9 months 2. Implant stability measured using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) scan at baseline and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient’s perception of surgery by measuring postoperative pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 7 days postoperative

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactManish Rathi
manishrathi.077h@gov.in+91 (0)9971238331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026