Skip to content

The effectiveness and acceptability of using a topically applied local anaesthetic to reduce perineal pain during the second stage of labour

The effectiveness and acceptability of using a topically applied local anaesthetic to reduce perineal pain during the second stage of labour

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN99732966
Enrollment
170
Registered
2005-09-02
Start date
2003-03-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Childbirth Pregnancy and Childbirth Childbirth

Interventions

Application of a local anaesthetic spray or placebo spray, applied to the perineum shortly prior to spontaneous vaginal delivery. Each 0.1 ml of active trial solution was formulated to contain: Lidoca

Sponsors

University of Bristol (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The participants comprised nulliparous and parous women who had a live singleton fetus with cephalic presentation at term (more than or equal to 37 weeks gestation) and for whom a spontaneous vaginal delivery was considered imminent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: During the antenatal period, women falling into certain broad categories were excluded from the trial. These were: 1. Women with a multiple pregnancy 2. Women booked to have a caesarean section, instrumental delivery or episiotomy 3. Women who had previously experienced an adverse reaction to a local anaesthetic 4. Women with insufficient spoken or written English either to provide valid consent or to complete the study questionnaires Once in labour the following women were also excluded: a. Women whose pregnancy was less than 37 weeks gestation b. Women with epidural analgesia c. Women whose baby had a non-cephalic presentation d. Women for whom sensitivity dictated that they should not approached to participate in the trial (for example, women whose baby was expected to require immediate intensive neonatal care following delivery) were also not invited to participate. The decision whether or not to recruit an individual woman into the trial was made by the midwife providing care.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome was pain immediately prior to delivery as recorded on the 0-100 Numerical Rating Scale component of the Adapted McGill Pain Questionnaire (Short-Form) and the co-primary outcome the incidence and extent of perineal and other genital tract trauma.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Delivery: 1. Delivery pain as measured on the remaining components of the AMPQ-SF 2. Maternal satisfaction with delivery analgesia 3. Maternal control and satisfaction with delivery Neonatal: 1. Levels of lidocaine in cord blood 2. Condition at birth 3. Infant feeding practices Postnatal: 1. Perineal pain at one week and two months following delivery 2. Perineal problems two months following delivery 3. Maternal feelings two months post delivery as measured on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale 159 and Maternal Adjustment to Motherhood Scale

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 11, 2026