Skip to content

The impact of high-volume or high-intensity tongue strength training on tongue strength in healthy older adults

Exercise dose for tongue strength training in healthy adults: high-volume or high-intensity training?

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN98899535
Enrollment
48
Registered
2024-02-08
Start date
2023-11-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tongue strength Oral Health

Interventions

Healthy older adults will be randomized to one of two treatment arms. Participants are assigned to one of the two therapy groups based on a sequence generated by the online randomization tool at https

Sponsors

Antwerp University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Minimum age 70 years (Van den Steen et al., 2018) 2. Belgian origin 3. Dutch native speaker (Vanderwegen et al., 2012) 4. MIPa and MIPp within Belgian normative data (Vanderwegen et al., 2012)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of dysphagia 2. Cognitive deficit (based on the MoCA-score < pc 8) (Thissen et al, 2010; Kessels et al., 2022) 3. Positive dysphagia screening (Yale Swallowing Protocol) (Suiter et al., 2014) 4. If participants drop out for a whole exercise week (i.e. if patients miss three consecutive therapy sessions)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Isolated tongue strength represented by Maximum Isometric Pressure (MIP) measured anteriorly (MIPa) and posteriorly (MIPp) in both treatment arms. MIP is measured with the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument version 2.1. and 2.3 (IOPI Medical LCC, Redmond, WA USA). Participants are instructed to press the bulb as hard as possible against the palate. The highest value obtained over three trials was used for MIP. MIPa and MIPp are performed at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training and 4 weeks after the last training session to document possible detraining effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Tongue strength during swallowing represented by Pswal measured anteriorly (PswalA) and posteriorly (PswalP) in both treatment arms. Pswal is measured with the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument version 2.1. and 2.3 (IOPI Medical LCC, Redmond, WA USA). Participants are instructed to swallow (saliva) as hard as possible with the bulb in an anterior and posterior position. The highest pressure obtained over three trials is used for Pswal. PswalA and PswalP are performed at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training and 4 weeks after the last training session to document possible detraining effects. 2. Frailty index measured with the Clinical Frailty Scale, a 9-point scale completed by the researcher. This index reflects the Frailty risk and general health of the subject. The frailty index is assessed at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training and 4 weeks after the last training session. 3. Nutritional status assessed by means of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), a standardised questionnaire to measure the risk of malnutrition in the geriatric population. The MNA is assessed at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of training and 4 weeks after the last training session.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Public ContactHanne Massonet
hanne.massonet@kuleuven.be+32 (0)16 33 63 70

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026