Skip to content

Single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression

A randomised phase III trial of single fraction radiotherapy compared to multifraction radiotherapy in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN97108008
Enrollment
700
Registered
2009-06-26
Start date
2009-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic spinal cord compression Cancer Malignant neoplasm of spinal cord, cranial nerves and other parts of central nervous system

Interventions

Patient randomisation is performed using a 24 hour remote internet based randomisation programme. Arm 1: External beam multi-fraction radiotherapy: 20Gy/5f Arm 2: External beam single fraction radio

Sponsors

University College London (UCL) (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria as of 04/02/2016: 1. Decision to treat made no more than 48 hours prior to treatment of spinal cord or cauda equina (C1 to S2) compression, based on a full spinal MRI or CT scan confirming compression carried out no more than one week prior to treatment 2. Single site of compression or multiple sites that can be treated within a single radiation treatment field 3. Histologically or cytologically confirmed malignant disease, or for prostate tumours a serum PSA >100 ng/ml at any point prior to randomisation (if biopsy done or planned but results not yet available patients may be entered provided all other inclusion and exclusion criteria are met. Biopsy results must be submitted on the relevant CRF page as soon as they are available) 4. Life expectancy greater than 8 weeks 5. Age greater than or equal to 18 years, either sex 6. Able to give informed consent 7. Willing and able to complete assessment forms Original inclusion criteria: 1. Proven diagnosis of spinal cord compression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan 2. Single site of compression or multiple sites that can be treated within a single radiation treatment field 3. Histologically or cytologically confirmed malignant disease, or for prostate tumours serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis of greater than 100 ng/ml 4. Life expectancy greater than 8 weeks 5. Age greater than or equal to 18 years, either sex 6. Able to give informed consent 7. Willing and able to complete assessment forms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria as of 04/02/2016: 1. Patients for whom surgery or chemotherapy treatment is more appropriate 2. Patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma, leukaemia or glioma 3. Patients who are known to be pregnant 4. Patients undergoing purely prophylactic treatment in the absence of radiological spinal cord or cauda equina compression 5. Patients whose spinal compression site has been treated previously with radiotherapy Original exclusion criteria: 1. Patients for whom surgery or chemotherapy treatment is more appropriate 2. Patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma 3. Patients who are known to be pregnant 4. Patients undergoing purely prophylactic treatment for early onset spinal cord compression 5. Patients undergoing treatment for compression affecting the spinal canal below L1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ambulatory status is determined through phone interviews with the patient or where this is not possible, reviewing the patient notes, applying a simple 4 point ambulatory scale at 8 weeks from day 1 of treatment compared to randomisation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Recovery of and time to ambulation is measured through phone interviews with the patient or where this is not possible, reviewing the patient notes, applying a simple 4 point ambulatory scale at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 from day 1 of treatment compared to randomisation 2. Ambulatory status is determined using measured through phone interviews with the patient or where this is not possible, reviewing the patient notes, applying a simple 4 point ambulatory scale at 1, 4, and 12 weeks (where available) compared to randomisation 3. Maintenance of ambulatory status is determined through phone interviews with the patient or where this is not possible, reviewing the patient notes, applying a simple 4 point ambulatory scale at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 from day 1 of treatment compared to randomisation 4. Bladder and bowel function is measured through phone interviews with the patient or where this is not possible, reviewing the patient notes, at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks from day 1 of treatment compared to randomisation 5. Acute side effects are measured using through phone interviews with the patient or where this is not possible, reviewing the patient notes, applying the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scales v4.02 or Radiation Treatment and Oncology Groups (RTOG) Scales at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks from day 1 of treatment 6. Quality of life is measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-30) questionnaire at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks from day 1 of treatment compared to randomisation. This is either posted to the patient from UCT CTC or administered by the hospital trial team if the patient is an inpatient. 7. Further treatment is recorded using through phone interviews with the patient or where this is not possible, reviewing the patient notes, at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and 12 months from day 1 of treatment 8. Duration of care in hospital, hospice, nursing home or home is det

Countries

Australia, England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026