Skip to content

Do light emitting diodes (LED) enhance orthodontic tooth movement?

Randomized controlled trial: Light emitting diodes (LED) with 430-480 nm wavelength versus placebo upon rate of tooth movement in orthodontic patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN96521746
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-08-14
Start date
2015-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angle Class 1 bimaxillary dento-alveolar protrusion Oral Health Angle Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

Interventions

Participants who met the inclusion criteria underwent orthodontic treatment using an LED device. A split mouth randomisation technique was used to allocate the side of the maxillary teeth (left or rig

Sponsors

Mahidol
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Adult patients age =18 years old - Angle’s Class I or II,with upper anterior teeth proclination/protrusion - Crowding less than 2 mm. - Treatment required full fixed edgewise appliance therapy of all permanent teeth, with bilateral symmetrical extraction of upper ?rst premolar teeth. 1. Aged 18 years or older 2. Angle Class I or II, with upper anterior teeth proclination/protrusion 3. Crowding less than 2 mm 4. Requiring full fixed edgewise appliance therapy of all permanent teeth, with bilateral symmetrical extraction of the upper first premolar teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Presence of systemic illnesses or bone diseases 2. Current exposure to any medical or dental condition that could potentially affect study results such as the use of bisphosphonates 3. Pregnancy 4. Plans to relocate or move during the treatment period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Distance and rate of canine movement, assessed using a synapse program on 3 digital panorex taken at the start of retraction and after retraction every 9 weeks. The rate of canine tooth movement was gathered at the end of phase 1 (week 3 - week 12 after start of orthodontic treatment), phase 2 (week 12 - week 12 after the start of orthodontic treatment) and over the total time (week 3 - week 21 after the start of the orthodontic treatment)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Canine angulation change, measured using Panorex film taken at the week 3 and week 21 2. Pain level score after application of LED curing light, measured through self-reported pain raiting on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0 indicates "no pain", 1-3 indicates "mild pain", 4-6 indicates "moderate pain" and 7-10 indicates "severe pain") after every visit (weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18) 3. Complications: 3.1. Tooth vitality, assessed using Electric Pulp Vitality Testing (EPT) at week 0 and week 21 3.2. Root resorption, assessed using parallel films at pre-treatment and post-treatment

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNita Viwattanatipa
Nitaviw@hotmail.com0864008716

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026