Skip to content

Comparing surgical fixation and conservative management using a cast in wrist fractures in people aged 65 years and older

Elderly - Fixation Of the Radius: Radiological and Clinical Evaluation (eFORRCE): A prospective randomised superiority trial of surgical versus conservative management for unstable fractures of the distal radius in patients aged 65 and older.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN95922938
Enrollment
178
Registered
2021-12-03
Start date
2022-02-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unstable fractures of the distal radius in patients aged 65 years and older Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

Surgical patients will be treated routinely with standard volar plate techniques as per routine trauma care. Following surgery, the post-operative assessment and course will be as per normal protocol

Sponsors

University of Edinburgh
Lead Sponsor
NHS Lothian
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to 120 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged =65 years 2. Dorsally angulated fractures of the distal radius 3. The treating surgeon believes the patient is suitable for surgical fixation 4. Operation date within 3 weeks of fracture 5. Closed or Gustilo-Anderson grade I injury

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients unable to give informed consent 2. Patients medically unfit to undergo surgery 3. Volar displaced fractures 4. Partial articular and isolated radial styloid fractures 5. Associated fractures to the upper limb and/or pre-existing pathology adversely affecting function 6. Associated ligamentous injury, dislocation or subluxation of the wrist 7. Open fractures of Gustilo-Anderson grade II or higher 8. Persisting neurovascular deficit requiring operative intervention 9. Off-ended/severely displaced fractures post attempted reduction that are deemed to require surgery by the treating surgeon 10. Non-residents who will be unable to attend for local follow-up 11. Patients unable to comply with follow-up, including English-language patient-reported outcome measures, either on the telephone or by post

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Wrist pain and disability assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at 1 year (52 weeks) post-injury

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Wrist pain and disability assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at 12 and 26 weeks 2. Health-related quality of life measured using EuroQol 3 Dimensions (3L) Score (EQ-5D-3L) at 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks 3. Physical function of the upper limb measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score at 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks 4. Pain assessed by VAS pain score at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks 5. Healthcare resource use, and comparative cost-effectiveness at 1 year (52 weeks) using data collected from patient interviews and questionnaire responses and appropriate statistical and economic analysis methods 6. Complication rate obtained by patient questionnaire responses and reviewing patient notes at 1 year (52 weeks) 7. Grip strength assessed using a dynamometer at 12 weeks 8. Wrist range of motion assessed using a goniometer at 12 weeks 9. Radiographic parameters (including radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, carpal malalignment, dorsal tilt, intra-articular step and intra-articular gap) assessed using X-ray imaging at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks

Countries

Scotland, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactKatrina Bell
katrina.bell@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk+44 (0)131 242 3545

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026