Inflammatory arthritis Musculoskeletal Diseases
Conditions
Interventions
Adaptix 3D x-ray imaging
The study is a prospective, unblinded, comparative feasibility study of ADT imaging compared to standard radiographs, which will trial ADT in a clinical population for the fi
Sponsors
University of Exeter
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Inflammatory arthritis requiring X-rays of the hands
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Unable to keep hands still for 15 seconds 2. Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant 3. Unable to provide informed consent 4. People who do not have sufficient proficiency in English language to read the participant information sheet or provide informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Diagnostic performance, measured by comparison of ADT imaging to imaging as usual, at the time of clinical imaging | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Joint space measurement, assessed using ADT and imaging as usual, at the time of clinical imaging 2. Bone density, measured using ADT, at the time of clinical imaging 3. Bone microarchitecture, measured using ADT, at the time of clinical imaging 4. Image quality of ADT compared to projection radiographs using signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio, at the time of clinical imaging 5. Patient acceptability, measured using an acceptability questionnaire at baseline 6. Clinician acceptability, measured using feedback on image quality at the end of recruitment | — |
Countries
England, United Kingdom
Contacts
Public ContactKaren Knapp
Outcome results
None listed