Skip to content

A feasibility study evaluating a risk score for the management of blunt chest wall trauma

A multi-centre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN95571506
Enrollment
120
Registered
2016-12-05
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Specialty: Injuries and emergencies, Primary sub-specialty: Musculoskeletal Trauma

Interventions

There will be four hospitals participating in the trial, which will be run using a stepped wedge design. In this design, all hospitals will commence data collection at the same time, as the control ar

Sponsors

ABMU Health Board
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosis of isolated blunt chest wall trauma 2. Aged 18 and over 3. Capable of giving consent to participation 4. Male or female 5. Presenting to the Emergency Department of participating hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients under the age of 18 years 2. Patients who lack capacity to give informed consent, 3. Patients with any immediately life-threatening injuries 4. Patients with any concurrent injury that will determine the patient’s management (rather than the chest trauma)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient recruitment rate will be recorded as the number of eligible patients who consent to trial participation at the end of the five month data collection period, at each site.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Clinician recruitment rate will be recorded as the number of eligible clinicians working within the participating ED who agree to take part in the study by the end of the five month data collection period, at each site 2. Response rate of follow up data (quality of life surveys) will be recorded as the number of patients returning postal surveys at the end of the five month data collection period, at each site 3. Clinicians Training Attendance rate will be recorded as the number of clinicians receive formal training in the use of the model, prior to the second data collection period (treatment arm), at each site 4. Compliance with use of model rate will be recorded as the number of times the clinician used the risk model for an eligible patient, at the end of the second month data collection period (treatment arm) 5. Overall mean quality of life as reported using the SF-12v2 survey for patients, at the end of the control (end of month two) and treatment (end of month five) data collection periods, at each participating site 6. Resource usage by patients as a results of the intervention as reported on the Client Service Receipt Inventory at six week follow-up

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactCeri Battle
ceri.battle@wales.nhs.uk+44 1792 703124

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026