Skip to content

Metacognitive skill training for schizophrenic patients

Metacognitive skill training for schizophrenic patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN95205723
Enrollment
150
Registered
2007-01-26
Start date
2006-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia Mental and Behavioural Disorders Schizophrenia

Interventions

Experimental intervention: MetaCognitive skill Training (MCT) focusing on delusion-relevant metacognitive biases in schizophrenia. Control intervention:
sessions are scheduled twice weekly.

Sponsors

German Research Foundation (DFG)/Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder 2. Current or prior delusional symptoms 3. Informed consent 4. Clinical stability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Age beyond 65 2. Severe brain damage 3. Intelligence Quotient (IQ) less than 70 4. More than or equal to five for ratings on hostility and non-cooperativeness and more than or equal to six on suspiciousness according to Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) interview 5. Incapacity to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Current primary outcome measure as of 01/11/2012: A delusion score derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): sum score of items p1 (delusions), p5 (grandiosity) and p6 (suspiciousness) Previous primary outcome measures until 01/11/2012: 1. Decline on PANSS positive subscale from T1 (baseline) to T2 (four weeks/assessment immediately after the end of intervention) 2. Conventional algorithm (i.e., sum of PANSS positive items one to seven)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Improvement of dysfunctional metacognitive biases (i.e., self-serving bias, jumping to conclusions bias, incorrigibility, over-confidence in errors, enhanced need for closure) 2. Subsequent to intervention represents secondary outcome parameter (i.e., difference T1-T2) Secondary analyses will include follow-up.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026