Skip to content

Randomised study for immunosuppression regimen in liver transplantation

Randomised trial of monotherapy with tacrolimus versus triple therapy with tacrolimus azathioprine and steroids

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN94834276
Enrollment
110
Registered
2008-07-18
Start date
2000-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced cirrhosis Digestive System Fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver

Interventions

Tacrolimus (Prograf®, Fujisawa Ltd, Ireland) 0.1 mg/kg/day was given in two divided doses in both MT and TT groups starting within 6 hours from transplantation via a nasogastric tube. Azathioprine was

Sponsors

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: From January 2000 to June 2007, in three liver transplant centres, (Royal Free Hospital, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary and St Vincents Hospital, Dublin; all using the same donor pool) consecutive transplant recipients were randomised if they: 1. Had cirrhosis 2. Were hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) positive in serum 3. Had previous histology confirming HCV-related disease 4. Had possible or confirmed/concomitant alcoholic aetiology or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 5. Were older than 18 years, either sex 6. Had given informed written consent (at listing for transplantation) 7. Received a cadaveric liver transplant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Retransplantation 2. Multi-organ, split or auxiliary transplants 3. Contraindications to tacrolimus or azathioprine 4. Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary end-point was whichever of the following occurred first: 1. Progression of fibrosis, to Ishak stage 4, or 2. Graft failure requiring retransplantation or patient death, or 3. Treatment failure for immunological reasons, i.e., more than two histologically confirmed episodes of cellular rejection failing to respond to therapy The primary endpoints were measured either in yearly intervals (biopsies) or whenever they occurred within the study period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end-points included: 1. Patient survival 2. Acute cellular rejection early (less than 14 days) or not 3. Chronic rejection 4. Steroid resistant cellular rejection irrespective of further changes in immunosuppression 5. Recurrence of HCV, defined by Ishak inflammation score greater than or equal to 4 6. Withdrawal from the randomised allocation The secondary endpoints were measured at yearly endpoints or whenever a clinical decompensation occurred.

Countries

Ireland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026