Skip to content

Clinical performance of double crown retained dentures using conical all-ceramic primary crowns

Long-term clinical success of conical electroplated double-crown-retained dentures on implants or natural abutments up to 11.5 years: a retrospective study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN94719711
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-11-07
Start date
2013-06-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Reduced dentition in upper and lower jaw Oral Health Reduced dentition in upper and lower jaw

Interventions

For data collection, the sheets of patients who received double-crown-retained dentures (DCRDs) between June 1998 and December 2013 were evaluated for failure of DCRDs, necessary repairs, pressure sou

Sponsors

Goethte University Frankfurt
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Dentures fabricated according to the Weigl protocol 2. Regular ttendance of follow-up exams 3. Tooth-supported DCRDs 4. Implant-supported DCRDs 5. Combined tooth/implant-supported DCRDs 6. Conical implant/abutment connections 7. Aged 18-91 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not treated according to the Weigl protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Failure of DCRDs (defined as the loss of the denture), evaluated by reviewing patient notes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following were evaluated by reviewing patient notes from patients between June 2013 and December 2013: 1. Necessary repairs to dentures 2. Pressure source 3. Occlusal adjustments 4. Problems with denture removal 5. Relining needs 6. Maintenance needs related to the denture abutments

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026