Skip to content

Comparing medical management with laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of deep endometriosis

Deep infiltrating endometriosis: management by medical treatment versus early surgery: DIAMOND

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN94462049
Enrollment
400
Registered
2022-05-10
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep infiltrating endometriosis Urological and Genital Diseases Endometriosis

Interventions

Women with deep endometriosis will be invited to take part. Women with deep endometriosis will be referred by their GP to specialist endometriosis centres and will be invited to take part in DIAMOND b

Sponsors

NHS Grampian
Lead Sponsor
University of Aberdeen
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women aged 18–49 years old seeking treatment for pain 2. Laparoscopically confirmed deep endometriosis +/- radiological imaging 3. Suitable for either medical or surgical management 4. Able and willing to give informed consent to participate and to participate in study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unfit for laparoscopic surgery 2. Have used or currently using GnRH analogues without satisfactory relief of pain symptoms 3. Previous bilateral oophorectomy 4. Previous surgery for deep endometriosis 5. Planning to conceive in the next 18 months 6. Confirmed bowel stenosis 7. Hydronephrosis or hydroureter caused by ureteric stenosis 8. Endometrioma >5 cm in diameter 9. Women with preference for medical treatment or surgical treatment 10. Current pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary clinical outcome: Endometriosis-associated pain measured using the pain domain of the condition-specific Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) at 18 months post-randomisation Primary economic outcome: Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from a health service perspective, measured using self-completed questionnaires and case note reviews at 18 months post-randomisation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient-reported outcomes measured using self-completed questionnaires at 3, 12, 18 months post-randomisation, unless stated otherwise: 1. Satisfaction with treatment measured on a six-point scale from ‘totally satisfied’ to ‘totally dissatisfied’ 2. Endometriosis-associated pain measured using the pain domain of EHP-30 3. Generic and condition-specific quality of life measured using EQ-5D and EHP-30 4. Need for further medical treatment and/or gynaecological surgery measured using self-completed questionnaires and case note review at 18 months post-randomisation 5. Serious adverse events and major surgical complications assessed using self-completed questionnaires, site-completed case report forms and case note reviews at 18 months post-randomisation 6. Discontinuation of randomised treatment assessed using self-completed questionnaires and case note review at 18 months post-randomisation 7. Occupational outcomes assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health V2.0 8. Sexual health measured using the EHP-30 sexual health module 9. Pregnancy measured using patient self-report and case note review at 18 months

Countries

England, Scotland, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026