Skip to content

Performance and acceptance of spherical vs toric multifocal contact lenses

Performance and acceptance of spherical vs toric multifocal contact lenses in a low astigmatic population - proof of concept study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN92830937
Enrollment
45
Registered
2021-03-18
Start date
2021-03-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia and astigmatism Eye Diseases Presbyopia, Astigmatism

Interventions

Sponsors

CooperVision International Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: There are no requirements as to participant race or gender. In order to be enrolled, each participant shall meet the following criteria: 1. 40 or more years of age 2. Current multifocal contact lens wearer 3. Spectacle refraction: Distance: Sphere: -6.00 D to + 4.00 D Astigmatism Power: -0.50 D to -1.25 D Axis; 180o ± 20o & 90o ± 20o Near addition: at 40 cm: +0.75 D to +2.50 D in three groups: - Emerging presbyopes: +0.75 D to +1.25 D - Established presbyopes: +1.50 D and +1.75 D - Advanced presbyopes: +2.00 D to +2.50 D 4. Best corrected visual acuity of at least 20/25 in each eye

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Ocular anterior segment infection, inflammation, abnormality, or active disease that would contraindicate contact lens wear 2. Newly prescribed (within the past 30 days) use of some systemic medications (such as antihistamines, decongestants, diuretics, muscle relaxants, tranquilizers, stimulants, anti-depressants, anti-psychotics, oral contraceptives) or new prescription eyedrops which is not rewetting/lubricating eyedrops for which contact lens wear could be contraindicated as determined by the investigator 3. Monocular participants (only one eye with functional vision) or participants fit with only one lens 4. Any moderate or severe ocular condition observed during the slit-lamp examination at the enrolment visit 5. History of herpetic keratitis, ocular surgery or irregular cornea 6. Known pregnancy or lactation during the study period 7. Enrolment of the family members of the investigator, family members of the investigator’s staff, or individuals living in the households of these individuals

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual satisfaction measured on a 100-point visual analogue scale after 1 week of wear

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Visual performance measured using LogMAR at distance, intermediate and near and monocularly after 1 week of wear 2. Lens centration measured using a 4-point forced-choice scale at Visits 3 and 4 3. Lens movement measured using a 5-point forced-choice scale at Visits 3 and 4 4. Intention to purchase measured using a 5-point forced-choice scale at Visits 3 and 4 5. Overall preference measured using a forced-choice scale with two alternatives at Visits 3 and 4

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactDeborah Moore
dmoore@otg.co.uk+44 (0)2072224224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026