Skip to content

A comparative study of techniques for alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction

Effect of a mixture of calcium sulfate and tricalcium phosphate versus sticky bone technique on alveolar ridge preservation: a clinical, radiographic, and histological split-mouth study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN92729767
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-09-19
Start date
2025-06-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction Oral Health

Interventions

The method of randomization used in this study is allocation by the draw-a-card method. Group A (Sticky Bone): Atraumatic extraction followed by application of tricalcium phosphate mixed with PRF u

Sponsors

Idlib University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 20–50 years 2. Good oral hygiene 3. Presence of two similar teeth requiring extraction in the same jaw (both upper and lower jaw) 4. The patient has two symmetrical teeth indicated for extraction 5. Type 1 socket classification (Elian) (indicating that the buccal bone plate is intact and undamaged following tooth extraction)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Smokers or alcohol users 2. Systemic diseases or medications affecting bone healing 3. Pregnant or lactating women 4. Presence of infection or fistula at the extraction site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Dimensional changes of soft tissues and the thickness of the soft tissue covering the alveolar ridge crest measured clinically after tooth extraction and six months post-extraction 2. Bone density of the newly formed bone and assessing the dimensional changes in the buccal and lingual walls of the socket, measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with a Vatech X-ray device immediately after tooth extraction and six months post-extraction 3. Quality of the newly formed bone measured using histology six months after the surgical procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Pain measured using a Visual Analog Score (VAS) at 1 and 7 days post-operative 2. Healing measured using the Healing Index Landry scale at 7 days post-operative 3. Soft tissue height measured using the periodontal probe (UNC-15) method at 6 months

Countries

Syria

Contacts

Public ContactGohar Mushtaq
gohar_mushtaq@idlib.edu.sy+963 7949825419

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026