Skip to content

Effectiveness of treatment with brace versus tape in acute lateral ankle sprains

Effectiveness of a 4 week treatment with ankle brace versus ankle tape on recurrent sprain and residual problems within one year in patients with acute lateral ankle sprains

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN92030205
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-01-03
Start date
2006-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute lateral ankle sprain Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Sprain and strain of ankle

Interventions

The intervention group received instructions from the sports physician about how to use and fix the Push Med ankle brace, which is a soft brace and based on the principle of the functional tape bandag

Sponsors

University Medical Center Utrect (Netherlands)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. At least 18 years old 2. Diagnosed with an acute lateral ankle sprain caused by an inversion trauma 3. Had to visit one of the participating practices or emergency departments within 14 days after the inversion trauma

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who sustained an eversion trauma, multiple trauma or complicated trauma (including cartilage injuries, fractures and dislocation) 2. Had a history of ankle surgery 3. Mentally incompetent patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Risk for re-injury based on the amount of patients reporting re-injuries within one year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Residual symptoms (objective and subjective) 1.1. The objective residual symptoms were swelling (yes/no), functional outcome, passive and active stability 1.2. The subjective residual symptom was pain 2. Dorsiflexion of the ankles was measured to determined functional outcome. Patients could have limited dorsiflexion in the injured ankle compared to the healthy ankle, no limitation in dorsiflexion, or better dorsiflexion than the healthy ankle. 3. Passive stability was measured with dynamic anterior ankle tester. The passive stability of both ankles could be equal, the passive stability of the injured ankle could be worse than the healthy ankle, or the passive stability of the healthy ankle could be worse than the injured ankle. 4. Four one leg stance tests with increasing difficulty with increasing difficulty were applied to measure active stability. The first one leg stance test was conducted with eyes open, the second with eyes closed, the third with eyes closed and knee in 45 degrees dorsiflexion, and the last, and most difficult, with eyes closed, knee in 45 degrees dorsiflexion and standing on the forefoot. Both legs were tested. Being able to stand on one leg for 15 seconds was classified as having accomplished a one lag stance test. 5. Pain consisted of four components associated to different activities, namely walking, running, turning and jumping. Patients were classified as having pain when they reported they had pain during at least one of these activities.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026