Skip to content

Computer therapy versus usual stimulation for people with long standing aphasia

Evaluating the cost effectiveness of computer therapy compared with usual stimulation for people with long standing aphasia: a feasibility study [Previously known as Computerised Word Finding Therapy for Stroke]

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN91534629
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-05-21
Start date
2009-10-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Stroke Research Network

Interventions

Thirty participants with aphasia will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to computer treatment using Step-by-Step word finding software by Jane Mortley (group 1) or usual care (grou

Sponsors

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosis of stroke and aphasia with word finding difficulties as one of the predominant features as assessed by the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) 2. No longer receiving treatment from a speech and language therapist so that the computer treatment can be better isolated and evaluated 3. First stroke and reported by close relatives/friends to have had no speech or language difficulty pre-stroke to isolate cause 4. Both male and female 18 years or above with no upper age limit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe visual or cognitive difficulties reducing ability to use the computer program, tested by the ability to see and perform a simple, non-verbally based computer game.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recruitment rate, measured at baseline, 5 months and 8 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measured at baseline, 5 months and 8 months: 1. Acceptability of using computer based word finding therapy 2. Change in participation and wellbeing 3. Change in word retrieval 4. Estimation of effect size 5. Quality adjusted life years 6. Resource use data

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026