Skip to content

A prospective, nonrandomized, noninterventional study to compare Nexfin CO-trek cardiac output with thermodilution cardiac output

A prospective, nonrandomized, noninterventional study to compare Nexfin CO-trek cardiac output with thermodilution cardiac output

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN91147138
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-09-10
Start date
2013-12-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac output measurement Circulatory System

Interventions

PRIOR TO PROCEDURE The standard pre-evaluation will include: 1. Informed consent 2. Screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria 3. Ba

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences LLC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects must be at least 18 years of age 2. Subjects must give signed written informed consent 3. Subjects' height and weight must be accurately obtained prior to study start

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Aortic or tricuspid valve regurgitation 2. Aortic stenosis or aneurysms 3. History of uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia 4. Any peripheral vascular disease or conditions such as Raynaud's disease or Buerger's disease 5. Insufficient perfusion of the digits 6. Inability to place the finger cuff appropriately due to subject anatomy or condition 7. Known pregnancy 8. Patients being treated with an intra-aortic balloon pump 9. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that clinically interferes with the study endpoints

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary study endpoint is the acquisition of the cardiac output values of the two devices to meet an acceptance criterion of Bias < 0.6 liters per minute.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary study endpoints (and acceptance criteria) are: 1. The comparability of both methods as determined by Bland-Altman analysis (Bias < 0.6, Percentage Error < 40.4) 2. The precision of Nexfin CO-trek versus TD (no acceptance criterion) 3. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the CO pairs of the two methods (no acceptance criterion)

Countries

Netherlands, United States of America

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026