Skip to content

Does a small incision at the time of total hip replacement confer an advantage to patients by comparison to a standard incision?

Does a small incision at the time of total hip replacement confer an advantage to patients by comparison to a standard incision?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN90825575
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2004-09-30
Start date
2003-09-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery: Total hip replacement Surgery

Interventions

Randomised controlled trial - 128 patients undergoing primary total hip replacement will be randomised at time of surgery. They will undergo the gold standard Exeter hip replacement in the usual fashi

Sponsors

Department of Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Any patient undergoing routine primary total hip replacement will be eligible. They will be approached at pre-assessment clinic and offered the opportunity to be involved in the research. Informed written consent to partake will be mandatory for inclusion and any patient who declines will be excluded. If they are happy to consent at this stage, consent will be given. If they require an opportunity to discuss the study with their family or GP, they may do so, and at time of admission to hospital for surgery will sign the consent form if they are happy to be included. Adult subjects only - of any age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Does not match inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of the study is to provide an evidence base regarding the most appropriate wound size in primary hip replacement. If significant benefit is found in one arm of the trial compared to the other, this practise will be adopted across the HIP Unit in primary THR. Thus, the research question that is being asked is: Does a small incision confer any greater benefit to patients when compared to use of a standard incision in primary total hip replacement? We plan to perform a randomised, controlled prospective trial to answer this question. Study endpoints: Comparison of peri-operative blood loss, post-operative haemoglobin levels and need for transfusion, length of hospital stay, comparison of operated limb swelling, pain measurement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026