Skip to content

Is neuromodulation with botulinum toxin type A an alternative treatment for chronic anal fissure?

Utility of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of chronic anal fissure

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN90354265
Enrollment
55
Registered
2024-02-16
Start date
2017-09-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic anal fissure Digestive System

Interventions

Patients were treated with local incoBoNT/A injection to heal anal fissure with a follow-up of 24 months at the Hospital Nuestra Señora del Prado (Talavera de la Reina, Spain) A vial of 50 U of BT fr
Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) was diluted in 1.25 ml normal saline, and three syringes were filled with 0.4 ml each (16 U). Patients were placed in the lithotomy position and pretreated with top

Sponsors

Hospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged over 18 years 2. Clinical anal fissure diagnosis for over 2 months that had not responded to previous treatments consisting of dietary and behavioral modifications, analgesics, and local treatment with calcium channel blocker (diltiazem 2%) or nitrates (trinitrate glyceryl 0.4%)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Non-idiopathic anal fissures 2. Previously untreated patients 3. BT contraindication such as miastenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, pregnancy, and acetylcholine deficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Healing rate at 2 years. Healing was defined as scarred AF and without symptoms; improvement was considered when the fissure persisted without symptoms; failure presented persistent fissure and symptoms. Patients who required a surgical approach were considered as a failure. Healing/improvement was assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-injection.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Anal manometry assessment of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) to measure anal resting pressure, voluntary squeeze pressure and pressure during the Valsalva maneuver. IAS pressures were measured using the THD® Anopress system (mmHg) at baseline and at 1 and 3 months post-injection. 2. Pain perception was measured using a pain visual analog scale (VAS) (scoring between 0 [no pain] and 10 [severe pain]) at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-injection. Pain perception was also measured at 1 week. 3. Incontinence was measured using the Wexner score (scoring between 0 [no incontinence] and 20 [total incontinence]) at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-injection 4. Quality of life was assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire (scoring between 0 [worst health status] and 100 [best health status]) at baseline and 3 months post-injection

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactTeresa Calderón
teresac@sescam.jccm.es+34 (0)652928109

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026