Facilitating access to cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in high-risk areas study

Facilitating Access to Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Training in high-risk areas (FACT) study

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN90350842

Enrollment

Registered

2023-03-28

Start date

2022-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular health Not Applicable

Interventions

This study is a collaborative realist enquiry, informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and associated Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW), consisting of a realist evidence synthesis, intervention

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. WP1: Adult members of the public from Black African and Caribbean, South Asian or mixed heritages who live in or are knowledgeable about high-risk areas 2. WP2: Stakeholder organisations that represent public/patient views related to CPR or organisations involved in developing, providing or campaigning for public resuscitation skills training, policymakers. Some participants from WP1 will also be invited to this workshop. Added 04/09/2024: 3. WP3: For parts 1 and 2 of the intervention, eligible participants for inclusion will be trusted members of Black African and Caribbean or South Asian communities or working with those communities in poorer areas. For Part 3, this will be adults from the communities the trusted person works with.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. People aged 17 years old and under 2. People who do not live in or are knowledgeable about high-risk areas (WP1)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Work package 1 (WP1) is an evidence synthesis using realist principles. It explored factors that help or hinder the participation of members of the public from poorer communities with south Asian or Black African of Caribbean heritage in providing bystander CPR. Data to identify factors and associated interventions will be collected from published literature, 5 workshops discussions with people from the communities of interest and a meeting with the study Public Advisory Group. Work package 2 (WP2) will produce a theoretically based intervention or interventions that can be evaluated in work package 3 (WP3). To ensure the interventions have a sound theoretical underpinning, the outputs of WP1 will be mapped to behaviour change theory and techniques and then developed into potential interventions. At a stakeholder meeting, the interventions will be discussed and prioritised and the final ones selected to be taken forward for evaluation in WP3. We will use the theoretical basis of how the interventions are intended to work, for whom and in what circumstances to create an evaluation framework for use in WP3. In WP3, the evaluation framework will allow the conduct of a realist evaluation to establish whether and how the intervention(s) work as intended or not, for whom, and in what circumstances. The framework will inform the development of data collection tools and the analysis. Data will be collected through qualitative interviews after the intervention and, if appropriate, using a study-developed measure (questionnaire) for intervention participants to provide feedback on their experiences of how the intervention worked. The evaluation framework will inform qualitative data analysis and synthesis of findings from the different data collection methods to evaluate how the interventions worked (or didn’t work), in what contexts and for whom to produce the intended (or unanticipated) outcomes of the interventions.	—

Measure

Time frame

Work package 1 (WP1) is an evidence synthesis using realist principles. It explored factors that help or hinder the participation of members of the public from poorer communities with south Asian or Black African of Caribbean heritage in providing bystander CPR. Data to identify factors and associated interventions will be collected from published literature, 5 workshops discussions with people from the communities of interest and a meeting with the study Public Advisory Group. Work package 2 (WP2) will produce a theoretically based intervention or interventions that can be evaluated in work package 3 (WP3). To ensure the interventions have a sound theoretical underpinning, the outputs of WP1 will be mapped to behaviour change theory and techniques and then developed into potential interventions. At a stakeholder meeting, the interventions will be discussed and prioritised and the final ones selected to be taken forward for evaluation in WP3. We will use the theoretical basis of how the interventions are intended to work, for whom and in what circumstances to create an evaluation framework for use in WP3. In WP3, the evaluation framework will allow the conduct of a realist evaluation to establish whether and how the intervention(s) work as intended or not, for whom, and in what circumstances. The framework will inform the development of data collection tools and the analysis. Data will be collected through qualitative interviews after the intervention and, if appropriate, using a study-developed measure (questionnaire) for intervention participants to provide feedback on their experiences of how the intervention worked. The evaluation framework will inform qualitative data analysis and synthesis of findings from the different data collection methods to evaluate how the interventions worked (or didn’t work), in what contexts and for whom to produce the intended (or unanticipated) outcomes of the interventions.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There are no secondary outcome measures	—

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactLouisa Edwards

facts@warwick.ac.ukNone available

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026