Skip to content

Te Ara Mua-Future Streets

Te Ara Mua-Future Streets: a controlled before-after intervention study of suburb-level street changes for walking and cycling in Auckland, New Zealand

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN89845334
Enrollment
13974
Registered
2018-06-21
Start date
2013-10-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Transport-related public health outcomes (physical activity, road traffic injury, social connection, air and climate pollution, diabetes risk) Not Applicable

Interventions

Two areas of Auckland have been randomised into an intervention and control area. The project statistician used a computer random number generator to select the intervention area. The other area was d
pedestrian priority across side streets
improved routes through linear parks
a fitness trail
improvements to lighting and informal surveillance
cycle lanes
way-finding
and landscaping.

Sponsors

University of Auckland
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Participants must be resident in the intervention and control area during the study period 2. Two age groups are included in the survey: 7-13 year-olds, and 13 years and over

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Participants were excluded from survey and pedometer participation if they were not able to mobilise outside their house 2. Participants were excluded from participating in the survey and pedometer measurement if they were less than 7 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Changes in walking and cycling, measured by a longitudinal random sample face-to-face survey of residents which includes a 1-week travel diary (baseline 2014; 2017; 2019) 2. Traffic speeds and volumes, measured by tube counters (2014, 2017, 2019) 3. Changes in physical activity, measured by a 7-day pedometer protocol in random sample survey participants, and by IPAQ questionnaire in the survey (2014, 2017, 2019) 4. Road traffic injury, measured objectively using hospitalisation and national crash analysis system (cas) data, and self-reported in the survey (2010-2014 and 2017-2021) 5. Neighbourhood perceptions, measured by validated survey questions (2014, 2017, 2019) 6. Greenhouse gas emissions, modelled from survey travel data (2014, 2017, 2019)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Road user behaviour, measured by video monitoring (2014, 2017, 2019) 2. Air quality, measured by stationary NO2 monitoring (2014, 2019) 3. Perceptions of walking and cycling, measured by in-depth qualitative interviews and focus groups (2014, 2018) 4. Researcher assessed changes in safety and security, measured with validated street audit tool (2014, 2019) 5. Diabetes risk, measured with a retrospective anonymised dataset of HbA1c tests taken from residents in the study areas before and after the intervention

Countries

New Zealand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026