Skip to content

Laminectomy or X-Stop – Which operation is more cost-effective for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?

Cost effectiveness and quality of life after treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X-STOP® Interspinous Process Distraction (IPD) device or laminectomy: a prospective randomised trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN88702314
Enrollment
110
Registered
2008-06-04
Start date
2008-12-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis Circulatory System Other peripheral vascular diseases

Interventions

Participants will be randomly allocated to the one of two treatment groups. A five block randomisation process will be used and patients are randomised the day before surgery. Lumbar

Sponsors

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age: 18-80 2. Sex: males and non-pregnant females 3. Chronic leg pain with or without back pain of greater than 6 months duration, partially or completely relieved by adopting flexed posture and who are suitable candidates for posterior lumbar surgery 4. Those who have completed at least 6 months of conservative treatment without obtaining adequate symptomatic relief 5. Degenerative changes at one or two adjacent levels between L1-S1 confirmed by X-ray, computerised tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Fixed motor deficit 2. Active infection or metastatic disease 3. Degenerative spondylolisthesis >= Meyerding Grade 2 4. Known allergy to implant materials 5. Severe osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis 6. Cauda equina syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cost of implanting X-stop interspinous distractor compared to conventional surgical decompression

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following will be assessed preoperatively, on discharge, at 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months: 1. Quality of life, assessed by the EQ-5D, 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) and Quebec Back Pain Disability Questionnaire 2. Clinical efficacy, assessed by the Zucher Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) 3. Safety (any complication either perioperatively or postoperatively)

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026