Skip to content

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a nursing intervention aiming at facilitating the hospital to home transition within a cardiologic Emergency Room (ER) [Évaluation de l?efficacité d?un modèle d?interventions infirmières de soutien à la transition hôpital-domicile dans une urgence cardiologique]

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN88422298
Enrollment
462
Registered
2008-02-06
Start date
2007-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facilitation of hospital to home transition after a visit to the ER Not Applicable Facilitation of hospital to home transition

Interventions

All eligible patients will meet with the research nurse after discharge care. Then, the study will be presented to the patient. After informed consent, the participants will be randomly assigned to th

Sponsors

Montreal Heart Institute (MHI) Research Centre (Canada)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male and female aged 18 years old or more presenting both of the following repeated visits to the ER criterion: 1.1. Taking six medications or more a day 1.2. Having made one visit or more to the cardiologic ER in the last 12 months 2. Visiting the ER for an unplanned visit (i.e. not coming to the ER on a planned basis, e.g. to receive a laboratory or diagnosis procedure result) 3. Being discharged from the ER directly to their home 4. Having the physical and cognitive capacities to answer a written questionnaire and to communicate by telephone 5. Being able to communicate in French or in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Having already another nursing follow-up in the 10 days following discharge (e.g. from another research project or from a specialised clinic) to avoid duplication of the nursing interventions being provided to the patient 2. Having already been recruited in the study in a precedent visit to the cardiologic ER

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
'Return to ER: the occurrence of any visits to the cardiologic ER in the month following randomisation. This will be measured using the hospital patient's registry.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes will be measured at baseline and one month following randomisation by a telephone interview and are as followed: 1. Health care continuity using the Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire (HCCQ), a 41-item questionnaire using a 5 points Likert scale (score 1 to 5, 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) measuring the patients' perception of continuity of care in regard to eight different dimensions. A higher score indicate a better continuity of care process according to the patient. 2. Patient's self-care management using the Therapeutic Self-Care Tool (TSCT), a 12-item questionnaire using a 5 points Likert scale (score 0 to 5, 0 = not at all, 5 = very much so) measuring the patients' ability to initiate and perform activities aiming at maintaining health, managing health problems and restoring functioning. A higher score indicate better self-care capacities in the patient. 3. Medication adherence scale using the Self-Reported Medication-Taking Scale (SR-MTS), a 4-item questionnaire using a dichotomous (yes or no) scale measuring patients' adherence to prescribed medication. A higher score indicate a poorer adherence to medication. 4. Patients' perception of control over the disease and of its consequences using three subscales of the Illness Perception Questionnaire - Revised (IPQ-R), a 38-item questionnaire using a 5 points Likert scale (score 1 to 5, 1 = totally agree, 5 = totally disagree) measuring the patients' perception of his disease. The three subscales used are: 4.1. Consequences (6 items) 4.2. Personal control (6 items) 4.3. Treatment control (5 items) Higher scores on the consequences subscale represent strongly held beliefs about the negative consequences of the disease. Higher scores on the control subscales represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness. 5. Anxiety and depressing feelings using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a 14-item questionnaire using a 4 points ordinal rating

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026