Skip to content

Deep sedation compared with moderate sedation in polyp detection during colonoscopy

Deep sedation compared with moderate sedation in polyp detection during colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN88128756
Enrollment
504
Registered
2010-08-26
Start date
2009-06-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sedation/colonoscopy Surgery Sedation/colonoscopy

Interventions

Patients in both groups initially received intravenously (IV) 2 mg (less than 70 kg body weight [b.w.]) or 3 mg (greater than 70 kg b.w.) of midazolam and 25 mg of pethidine. Additional midazolam was

Sponsors

Venizelion General Hospital of Heraklion (Greece)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 50 years and older, either sex 2. Undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, postpolypectomy surveillance, or other indications for which the primary goal of the examination was detection of neoplasia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Polyposis syndromes 2. Hereditary nonpolyposis CRC 3. Previous surgical resection of the colon or rectum 4. Active anticoagulation 5. Inflammatory bowel disease 6. Cases with inadequate bowel preparation 7. Incomplete colonoscopy 8. Cases where the desired level of sedation was not achieved or the level of unintended level of deep sedation occurred

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Polyp detection rate, measured at end of study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measured at end of study: 1. Patients' and the endoscopist?s satisfaction 2. Recovery time 3. Adverse events related to sedation

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026