Skip to content

Feasibility study to reduce avoidable hospitalisations and promote Better Health in Residents in Care Homes (BHiRCH)

Feasibility study of an evidence based intervention to reduce avoidable hospital admissions in residents in care homes (the Better Health in Residents in Care Homes) study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN86811077
Enrollment
41
Registered
2017-09-13
Start date
2016-10-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Specialty: Ageing, Primary sub-specialty: Ageing

Interventions

The intervention is implemented at the level of the whole care home. The BHiRCH programme is a complex intervention, with 6 key components. These are: 1. Early Warning
or 2) anyone else in the care home (including residents, other staff and care partners) notices a change
at the latest by the end of the shift. Care assistants or nurses complete the paper-based Stop and Watch Early Warning Tool, circling the changes they observed, and notify the nurse of this change, gi

Sponsors

University College London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The study implements an enhanced version of usual care and because of the clustered nature of the setting this will be implemented across the care home. All residents will be invited to be involved in the collection of individual level outcome data. 2. Aged 18 and older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Residents receiving end of life treatment or palliative care or those who have stated they do not wish to be involved in research.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The feasibility study seeks to address the following outcomes, all intended to assist in refining study procedures and the implementation of the intervention: 1. Recruitment is measured using recruitment numbers of staff, residents and care partners in the first three months of the study 2. Retention of participants is measured using final participant numbers at the end of the study (month three) 3. The delivery of the intervention is measured using analysis of uptake of intervention materials and staff interviews at months one, two and three 4. Any necessary refinements to the implementation guidance are measured using staff interviews at months one, two and three 5. The feasibility of collecting data is measured using analysis of the completeness of case report forms at months one, two and three 6. Resource requirements for collection and analysis of data is measured using data capture on time taken to complete these tasks at months one, two and three

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
There are no secondary outcome measures.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactAlan Blighe

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026