Skip to content

Early intervention aimed at preventing persistent complaints after mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison between cognitive behavioral therapy and telephone counselling

The effect of early CBT-based intervention compared to telephone counselling on return to work and complaints after mild traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN86191894
Enrollment
88
Registered
2016-07-16
Start date
2013-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent post-concussive complaints following mild traumatic brain injury. Nervous System Diseases Persistent post-concussive complaints following mild traumatic brain injury.

Interventions

Patients who have given consent to participate are randomly assigned the early intervention or control treatment. by drawing a lot from an envelope containing 20 lots are put (10 CBT, 10 control) by a

Sponsors

Hersenstichting Nederland (Dutch Brain Foundation)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients admitted to the emergency departments (ED’s) of the participating centers 2. Age between 18 and 65 years 3. Normal admission CT scan 4. In paid work or studying at the time of injury 5. Patients at-risk for persistent post-concussive complaints are selected for enrollment in the intervention, starting within 4-6 weeks post-trauma. At-risk status was based on the score on the Head Injury Symptom Checklist (HISC), which comprises of 16 complaints commonly described after TBI with premorbid levels, using values from 0 to 2 (0= never, 1= sometimes, 2= often). Eligible patients must report three or more complaints of which at least one should be in the cognitive or in the emotional domain.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Chronic alcohol and/or drug abuse 2. Major psychiatric or neurological disorders 3. Without comprehension of Dutch language 4. Without a permanent home address

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Level of resumption of work is measured using the RTW scale at 6 and 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Working status, defined as total days off work at 12 months, is measured by a questionnaire at 12 months 2. Functional outcome is measured using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E), determined at 6 and 12 months 3. Trauma related complaints are measured using the Head Injury Symptom Checklist (HISC), Dutch version of the Rivermead Postconcussion Questionnaire at 2 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months 4. Physical and mental complaints are measured using the Symptoms Checklist (SCL-90 revised) at 6 and 12 months 5. Mood is measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) at 2 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months 6. Impact of Event is measured using the DSM criteria PTSS-List and Centrality of Event List-short at 2 weeks, 6 and 12 months 7. Coping is measured using the Utrechtse Copinglist (UCL) at 2 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months 8. Fatigue is measured using the Dutch Multidimensional Fatigue Scale at 12 months 9. Self-efficacy is measured using the Dutch General Self-Efficacy Scale (DGSES) at 6 and 12 months 10. Executive dysfunction is measured using the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) at 6 and 12 months

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026