Skip to content

Photodynamic versus white light-guided treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

PHOTOdynamic versus white light-guided treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: randomised trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN84013636
Enrollment
533
Registered
2014-07-25
Start date
2014-10-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Cancer

Interventions

Randomisation will be undertaken centrally using either the secure web-based or the 24-hour Interactive Voice Response randomisation system at the Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT) in Ab

Sponsors

Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult men and women aged = 16 years 2. First suspected diagnosis of bladder cancer 3. Visual/ultrasound/CT diagnosis of intermediate/high risk NMIBC 3.1. White light visual appearances of intermediate or high risk disease (=> 3cm, two or more tumours, or flat velvety erythematous changes alerting a clinical suspicion of CIS). 3.2. Suspicion of papillary bladder tumour > 3cm based on ultrasound or computerized tomography (CT) scanning (without hydronephrosis) 4. Written informed consent for participation prior to any study specific procedures 5. Willing to comply with lifestyle guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Visual evidence of low risk NMIBC (solitary tumour 5 years upon trial entry) 6. Evidence of metastases 7. Porphyria or known hypersensitivity to porphyrins 8. Known pregnancy (based on history and without formal testing, in keeping with day-to-day NHS practice of PDD use) 9. Any other conditions that in the Principal Investigator?s opinion would contraindicate protocol treatment 10. Unable to provide informed consent 11. Unable or unwilling to complete follow up schedule (including questionnaires)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare time to recurrence, for each of the two treatment strategies, with a principal point of interest at 3 years. 2. To evaluate cost effectiveness by the incremental cost for recurrence avoided and cost utility as the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained at three years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objectives will further explore clinical and cost effectiveness of photo dynamic surgery: Clinical effectiveness: 1. Measure relative rate of disease progression at 3 years 2. Measure relative harms and safety 3. Measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cancer specific survival

Countries

England, Scotland, United Kingdom, Wales

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026