Skip to content

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a study comparing shockwave therapy to an ultrasound guided injection for the treatment of lateral hip pain

Does focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy improve greater trochanteric pain syndrome compared to an ultrasound guided steroid injection?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN83382238
Enrollment
101
Registered
2018-11-29
Start date
2015-07-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Specialty: Musculoskeletal Disorders, Primary sub-specialty: Non-pharmacological Interventions

Interventions

128 patients were recruited to the study and randomised into two arms. Randomization was carried out using dedicated computer software (StratOs vs 1.34, Orthopaedic Institute Ltd, Oswestry, UK) and st

Sponsors

The Orthopaedic Institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A patient is eligible for the trial if the patient: 1. Is aged 18+ years 2. Has symptoms consistent with GTPS for at least 6 months 3. Failed conservative management in any other care setting 4. Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A patient is ineligible for the trial if the patient: 1. Has hip joint osteoarthritis requiring treatment on a plain radiograph 2. Had surgical treatment specifically targeted at GTPS within last 6 months e.g. bursectomy/ITB lengthening 3. Has ipsilateral Total Hip Replacement. (patient will not be able to undergo corticosteroid injection in clinic setting) 4. Has contraindictions to ESWT treatment; pregnancy, anticoagulant therapy, advanced peripheral neuropathy, local infection, malignancy, unresolved fractures. 5. Has a previous history of complications with ESWT 6. Has a recent history of acute hip trauma 7. Has a recent history of acute sciatica 8. Is not able to attend or comply with treatment or follow-up scheduling 9. Participates in any other clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain measured using the visual analogue pain score (VAS) at baseline, 3 and 12 months post intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Function assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Trendelenburg test at baseline, 3 and 12 months post intervention. 2. Quality of life assessed using the SF-36 at baseline, 3 and 12 months post intervention. 3. Symptom improvement assessed using a Likert scale at 3 and 12 months. 4. Completion of physiotherapy or any problems with any treatments received, assessed using a patient diary kept for 1 year and returned at final follow-up

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026