Skip to content

Pacemaker therapy for drug-refractory symptoms in mid-cavity hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Distal ventricular pacing and intraventricular gradient reduction for symptomatic relief in drug-refractory hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with mid-cavity obstruction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN82621856
Enrollment
25
Registered
2018-01-11
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Circulatory System

Interventions

Patients will be identified in outpatient cardiomyopathy clinics, with initial screening and eligibility assessment made by a researcher. A trained member of the research team will take informed conse

Sponsors

Queen Mary University of London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female, >18 years 2. Referred for PPM +/- ICD implantation for either primary prevention of sudden cardiac death or other indications such as heart block or obstructive physiology 3. HCM patients with a mid-cavity gradient of =30 mmHg demonstrated by echocardiography and morphology confirmed by cardiac MRI. Gradient confirmed by cardiac catheterisation 4. All patients should be taking maximum tolerated doses of beta blockers or verapamil with or without disopyramide 5. Symptoms refractory to optimum medical therapy as above, for example breathlessness, chest pain, dizziness, or syncope

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with multi-level obstruction, i.e. across the mid-cavity and outflow tract 2. Patients with moderate or severe valvular stenosis or regurgitation due to primary valvular disease 3. Patients with untreated symptomatic coronary disease 4. Patients in atrial fibrillation at the time of implantation 5. Pregnancy 6. Renal failure with eGFR < 20mL/min 7. Any patient not suitable in the clinicians opinion 8. Any patient who is for whatever reason is not expected for more than one year 9. Patients unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Direct measurement of obstructive gradient (mmHg) via intracardiac catheter during pacemaker implant; Timepoint(s): During implant

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The feasibility of performing a cross-over study and the associated performance tests and symptomatic assessments in this patient population. The statistical information collected will be used to design a much larger research trial of patient benefit.

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026