Soft and hard tissue remodelling in post-extraction immediate dental implants Oral Health
Conditions
Interventions
Patients requiring single tooth extraction in the anterior and premolar areas were recruited for this study. Self-tapping, screw-shaped Biomimetic OCEAN, Avinent® implants of different lengths and dia
Sponsors
Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy individuals above 18 years who underwent immediate implant placement following single tooth extraction and were intended to receive implants 2. Non-smokers 3. Enough quantity of native bone to achieve primary stability 3. Patient has adequate mesiodistal space for implant placement 4. Patient available for follow-up according to protocol for 12 months post-loading to be able to assess the results of the proposed investigation
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Medically compromised patients 2. Smokers 3. Presence of active periodontal disease 4. Symptomatic apical pathology before extraction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Dental implant survival, defined as percentage of dental implants that presented successful osseointegration, lack of complications and bone loss less than 0.2 mm/year after loading at 1-year post-loading 2. Dental implant success, defined as percentage of implants that survived and the pink aesthetic score was above 7 and the white aesthetic score was above 5 at 1-year post-loading | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Aesthetic of gums measured using the pink aesthetic index at 1-year post-loading 2. Aesthetic of false tooth measured using the white aesthetic index at 1-year post-loading 3. Buccal plate resorption measured using cone-beam CT at 1-year post-loading 4. Patients' reported outcomes measured using questionnaire and visual analogue scale at 1-year post-loading | — |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed