Skip to content

Hand in Hand - a work environment intervention for improved employee health in early education and care

Hand in Hand - a work environment intervention for improved employee health in early education and care: a Goldilocks Work inspired cluster-randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN81684777
Enrollment
246
Registered
2025-10-06
Start date
2025-09-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occupational health among ECEC staff Other

Interventions

The aim of the intervention is to enhance the health of ECEC staff by promoting a better work environment, particularly in areas where the work environment and quality of (ECEC) intersect. The trail i

Sponsors

National Institute of Occupational Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All employees directly involved in childcare from the recruited institutions who consent to participate in the scientific evaluation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Current key exclusion criteria as of 21/05/2026: 1. From the ergonomic evaluation: Pregnant women with adjusted work tasks 2. Allergy to tape or tape adhesive _____ Previous key exclusion criteria: 1. From the ergonomic evaluation: Pregnant women 2. Allergy to tape or tape adhesive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Current primary outcome(s) as of 21/05/2026: 1. Work-related fatigue is measured using four single items regarding energy, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, and emotional fatigue adapted from Hooff et al (2007) at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up 2. Need for recovery is measured using the Need for Recovery scale at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up _____ Previous primary outcome(s): 1. Physical workload is measured using wearable sensors at baseline and 1 year follow-up 2. Emotional dissonance is measured using the Frankfurt Emotional Work Scales at baseline and 1 year follow-up 3. Emotional demands are measured using the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) at baseline and 1 year follow-up 4. Work-related fatigue is measured using three single items regarding physical fatigue, mental fatigue, and emotional fatigue adapted from Hooff et al (2007) at baseline and 1 year follow-up 5. Need for recovery is measured using the Need for Recovery scale at baseline and 1 year follow-up 6. Depression and anxiety symptoms are measured using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5) at baseline and 1 year follow-up 7. Musculoskeletal pain is measured using the Standardised Nordic Questionnaire at baseline and 1 year follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Current key secondary outcome(s) as of 21/05/2026: 1. Physical workload is measured using wearable sensors at baseline and 1 year follow-up, and with two questions at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up on lifting based on a question from Statistics Norway and on self-perceived physical exertion measured using the Borg CR10 scale 2. Musculoskeletal pain is measured using the Standardised Nordic Questionnaire at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up 3. Interference of musculoskeletal pain with work performance is measured using the Standardised Nordic Questionnaire at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up 4. Emotional dissonance is measured using the Frankfurt Emotional Work Scales at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up 5. Emotional demands are measured using the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) at baseline and 1 year follow-up 6. Compassion satisfaction is measured using the ProQOL – Compassion Satisfaction subscale at baseline and 1 year follow-up 7. Depression and anxiety symptoms are measured using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-5) at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up 8. Interference of depression and anxiety symptoms with work performance is measured using two items based on the Health Survey Short Form (SF-36) at baseline and every three months until 1 year follow-up 9. Awareness of how the work environment and ECEC quality go hand-in-hand is measured using questionnaire at baseline and 1 year follow-up 10. Sickness absence is measured using register-based physician-certified sickness absence data (number of days) at baseline and 1 year follow-up 11. ECEC quality is measured using a questionnaire adapted from EBBA (En Bedre Barnehage for Alle) [Better daycare for all] at baseline and 1 year follow-up _____ Previous key secondary outcome(s): 1. Awareness of how the work environment and ECEC quality go hand-in-hand is measured using questionnaire a

Countries

Norway

Contacts

Public ContactSuzanne Merkus
suzanne.merkus@stami.no+47 (0)23 19 52 65

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 25, 2026