Skip to content

Evidencing the need for routine sensory-motor assessment and support for autistic adults

Evidencing the need for routine sensory-motor assessment and support for autistic adults and identifying appropriate intervention pathways

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN81585166
Enrollment
210
Registered
2024-08-15
Start date
2024-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sensory motor conditions in autistic people Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

For phase 1, consented autistic participants will be offered the Evaluation in Ayres Sensory Integration (EASI) assessment. Study OTs will collect demographics, perform the EASI, the Occupational Circ

Sponsors

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Phase 1: 1. Diagnosis of an Autism Spectrum condition without a Learning Disability (LD) 2. >18 years without LD 3. Presenting at participating adult autism diagnostic clinics (GMMH and Merseycare) Phase 2: 1. Clinicians who assess and support autistic adults with sensory motor needs 2. Able to understand written English and access the internet 3. >18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Phase 1: 1. Outside of stated age range. 2. Diagnosis of a Learning Disability 3. Unable to understand verbal and written English as they will need to respond to both verbal and written questions 4. Outside-stated diagnostic clinics. Phase 2: Clinicians who do not assess and support autistic adults for sensory motor needs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evidence on the level of need for sensory and motor difficulties (SMD) assessment in autistic adults without LD will be measured using the % of autistic adults without LD who are willing to take up an SMD assessment and the % of these that are identified as needing support following assessment recorded in study data at one time point

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Proof of concept and feasibility measured using open-ended qualitative survey items and Quality of life (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version) to facilitate future development and evaluation of the toolkit and pathway at one time point 2. A prototype SMD toolkit providing an itemised list of resources, detailing when they could be used (based on patient presentation), what they measure or support, available evidence base and what training might be required enabled and measured using study data at one time point

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactEmma Gowen
emma.gowen@manchester.ac.uk+44 (0)1613064548

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026