Sacral fracture Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Fracture of lumbar spine and pelvis
Conditions
Interventions
Following initial treatment, when the patient’s condition was sufficiently improved to allow surgical intervention, the current surgery was performed. This is a single step procedure, which took an av
an image boost was used during the course of operation (conventional C-arm fluoroscopy).
Two initial skin incisions were made for all cases. A longitudinal and curved approach to the
another one was made on a line along the contralateral iliac bone through PSIS. To allow a deeper seating of the screw head and prevent prominence of the metal work under the soft tissues, we made a b
Sponsors
Affiliated Dongfeng Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Vertical unstable sacral fractures 2. Neural injury with associated intraforaminal debris
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Soft tissue defects that prevent operation zone coverage (the lumbosacral spine zone) 2. L4, L5 and iliac bone fractures through the insertion points of rod and pedicle screw system 3. Pathological fracture caused by osteoporosis or tumor 4. Follow-up less than 10 months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1.The following were measured post-operatively by reviewing patient and operation notes: 1.1. Time from admittance to surgery (delay days) 1.2. Duration of surgery 1.3. Blood loss volume and blood vessel 1.4. Nerve injury | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. The following were measured post-operatively by reviewing patient and operation notes: 1.1. Follow-up duration 1.2. Neurological deficit 1.3. Skin lesion 1.4. Deep infection when reviewing patient and operation notes. 2. The following were measured using X-ray and CT imaging: 2.1. Tenderness 2.2. Loss of reduction 2.3. Fracture heal | — |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed