Skip to content

Can physical activity during work be designed so it promotes health among industrial workers?

Can productive work be redesigned to change physical behavior so it promotes health among industrial workers? A cluster randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN80969503
Enrollment
70
Registered
2021-09-10
Start date
2021-09-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal health among industrial workers Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

This study will investigate a 12-week workplace intervention aiming to improve the musculoskeletal health of industrial workers by redesigning their productive work. More specifically, the interventio
1) training in using

Sponsors

National Research Centre for the Working Environment
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: =20 hours weekly work at one of the two participating production sites within the organization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Workers only working night shifts 2. Workers known/expected to leave the company/department within the intervention period 3. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Low back pain intensity is measured with a numeric scale (NRS, 0-10) at baseline (following work for 5 days in week 1) and follow up (following work for 5 days at week 12)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Composition of physical behaviors (i.e., sitting, standing and active) during work measured with accelerometry at baseline (for 5 days in week 1) and follow up (for 5 days in week 12) 2. Accumulated time in long bouts of sitting and standing during work measured with accelerometry at baseline (for 5 days in week 1) and follow up (for 5 days in week 12) 3. Perceived physical exertion at work measured with a numeric scale (0-10) measured at baseline (following work for 5 days at week 1) and follow up (following work for 5 days at week 12) 4. Fatigue and energy levels measured with a numeric scale (0-10) measured at baseline (following work for 5 days at week 1) and follow up (following work for 5 days at week 12) 5. Self-rated productivity at work measured on a numeric scale (0-10) at baseline (week 1) and follow up (week 12) 6. Cost-effectiveness measured by incremental change in cost-effectiveness (ratio of incremental change in cost and change in low back pain intensity) and return on investment (indicated by the return-on-investment ratio) collected during the 12-week intervention 7. Dose delivered, dose received and fidelity measured with records of consultations delivered (conducted in weeks 1, 4 and 7), list of participants (collected at weeks 1, 4 and 7), and work schedules (collected at weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 weeks)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026