Skip to content

Evaluation of outcomes after spinal fusion with a Scarlet® ALT Hyperlordotic titanium secured cage implant

Clinical and radiological evaluation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery with Scarlet ALT Hyperlordotic

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN80797849
Enrollment
45
Registered
2023-09-29
Start date
2023-09-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical treatment of Degenerative Disk Diseases (DDD) of the lumbar spine at various contiguous level from L2 to S1 Surgery

Interventions

The SCARLET®AL-T system is implanted via an open or a minimally invasive anterior approach (ALIF). All the data will be collected per the sites’ standard of care and based on their availability as r

Sponsors

Spineart (Switzerland)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age =18 years 2. Patients who received at least one Scarlet® AL-T Hyperlordotic 3. Informed Consent Form signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision or who is under guardianship 2. Subject who does not speak/understand French

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Interbody fusion rate of the treated level(s), evaluated on radiological images by the surgeon within the study FU period as Solid fusion, Fibrous union, or Non-union. The performance of Scarlet® AL-T Hyperlordotic will be demonstrated if >90% of the patients have a “solid fusion” acquired within the study on all level(s) treated with Scarlet® AL-T Hyperlordotic evaluated on radiological images at 20 months (V7) PO.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The performance of Scarlet® AL-T Hyperlordotic will be measured or confirmed by: 1. The time to fusion (in months) of the treated level (s) based on the fusion status (solid fusion confirmed) on radiological images at 20 months (V7) 2. The lumbar lordosis restoration on radiological images, by measuring the Cobb angle (°) between the superior sacral plate and the superior surface of the L-1 vertebra, at discharge (V3) and 20 months (V7) postoperation (PO), compared to the preoperative visit. 3. The sagittal balance (positive, neutral or negative) restoration on radiological images, by measuring the C7 plumb line, at discharge (V3) and 20 months (V7) PO, compared to the preoperative visit 4. The clinical benefit, by assessing low back disability and change in disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire at 20 months (V7) PO compared to preop (V1) 5. The patient’s pain (back and leg) using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 20 months (V7) PO compared to preop (V1) 5. The clinical benefit with the clinical and neurological examination (low back pain, motor/sensory deficit) assessed by the surgeon at discharge (V3), and 20 months (V7) PO compared to the preoperative visit. 6. The safety by assessing the subsidence rate and type (early or delayed and cranial or caudal) assessed on radiological images at treated level(s) at 20 months (V7) PO. 7. The safety by assessing the osteolysis rate around Scarlet® AL-T Hyperlordotic and its screws, assessed on radiological images as lucency at the cage margins or around screws, at 20 months (V7) PO. A lucency suggests device movement at the operated level and loosening of the device. 8. The Scarlet® AL-T Hyperlordotic safety throughout the study to the last post-operative FU by reporting the incidence and time to resolution of all adverse device effects (ADEs) and all serious adverse events (SAEs) including all surgical revisions.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026