Skip to content

Neonatal survival, cultural safety and traditional midwifery in indigenous communities of Guerrero State, Mexico

Neonatal survival, cultural safety and traditional midwifery in indigenous communities of Guerrero State, Mexico: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN80090228
Enrollment
40
Registered
2009-07-24
Start date
2009-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maternal, perinatal and neonatal health Pregnancy and Childbirth

Interventions

The following interventions to be carried out immediately in three randomly selected geographic areas of the municipality and, after the two-year trial period, in the remaining three areas: 1. Materia

Sponsors

CIET Tropical Disease Research Centre (Mexico)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The following have been randomised into three geographic areas for immediate intervention and three for delayed intervention: 1. Twenty midwives identified by the baseline survey as having assisted at three or more births in the previous 3 years 2. All women in the baseline sample clusters who give birth or become pregnant during the trial period 3. All adult family members of the above 4. All families of the baseline sample communities where pregnancies or births occur during the trial period 5. Community health managers (gestores) certified by the Red de Promotores de Salud Indigenas Amuzgos, A.C. (Indigenous Amuzgo Health Promoters Network) 6. Medical personnel and support staff of health centres and hospitals serving the municipality of Xochistlahuaca

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Does not meet inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The 2011 follow-up survey will measure the following indicators from the 2008 baseline survey among women who gave birth during the previous three years: 1. Neonatal deaths 2. Number of times women seen by midwife during pregnancy 3. Proportion of births at home attended by midwives 4. Frequency of recourse to midwife in case of pregnancy complications 5. Frequency of recourse to midwife in case of complications with newborns 6. Proportion of women intending to have future births at home 7. Among women who gave birth in health institutions, questions about their treatment including birth position, availability of translators, presence of family members at birth, presence of midwife at birth, bathing in cold water, treatment of the placenta, retention of amulets and how respectful they considered their treatment to have been

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. From survey of women who gave birth in previous three years: 1.1. Prevalence of violent acts toward pregnant women 1.2. Proportion of births without external assistance 2. From survey of husbands, mothers and mothers-in-law: 2.1. Opinion as to whom the woman should consult first when she learns she is pregnant 2.2. Opinion as to who should attend the woman first if she has complications during pregnancy 2.3. Opinion as to who should decide whether to take the woman to the hospital if there are complications during childbirth 2.4. Perception of neighbours' preferences as to who should provide antenatal care 2.5. Perception of neighbours' preferences as to home vs institutional birth 3. From survey of health workers: 3.1. Consistency of criteria for classifying levels of pregnancy risk and referral of high risk pregnancies, complicated births and neonatal emergencies 3.2. Willingness to allow midwives to participate in institutional births and to charge for it 3.3. Proportion of workers who have received any intercultural training All secondary outcomes will be followed-up for three years.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026