Skip to content

Laser versus conventional treatment for active acne in primary care

Laser versus conventional treatment for active acne in primary care: a randomised ocntrolled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN78675673
Enrollment
40
Registered
2005-05-10
Start date
2005-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne vulgaris Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases Acne vulgaris

Interventions

1. Pulsed-dye laser at 585 nm 2. Lymecycline orally & isotretinoin gel topically

Sponsors

West London Research Network (WeLReN) (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 16-45 with moderate active inflammatory acne vulgaris

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not provided at time of registration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement after 3 months in both groups using the Leeds revised grading system

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction, compliance, cost

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026