Skip to content

A brain imaging study of the effects of electrical brain stimulation on attention in healthy people

A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging investigation into the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on information processing and and neural activity in healthy volunteers with trait anxiety

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN78638425
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-08-08
Start date
2015-04-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mood disorders, anxiety disorders, trait anxiety Mental and Behavioural Disorders Mood disorders, anxiety disorders, trait anxiety

Interventions

Participants are randomised into two arms using a list generated by an Excel spreadsheet of randomly generated numbers between 0 and 1, where numbers below 0.5 represent the sham-active order and numb
however, the order in which they do is randomised. Double-blinding is achieved using a study mode on the tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) device with blinding codes assigned by a party n

Sponsors

University of Oxford
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 18-45 years old 2. Female 3. Willing and able to provide informed consent 4. Healthy 5. Right-handed 6. Normal range on trait anxiety (based on State-Trait Anxiety Index (STAI) pre-screening online anxiety questionnaire) 7. Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Current significant medical condition 2. Current or past psychological disorder (e.g. depression, anorexia) 3. Any family history of extreme mood fluctuations (e.g. elated mood states) 4. Current medications (except for contraceptive treatment) or herbal remedies such as St John's wort 5. Current pregnancy or likelihood of becoming pregnant during the study 6. Participation in any other psychological or medical experiment involving taking any kind of drugs, within the last 3 months 7. Previous participation in a brain stimulation study will be taken into account and advice will be sought from the secondary supervisor on whether they should be included, based on the type of stimulation received, the location of the stimulation and the number of sessions. If the secondary supervisor advises that the nature of the stimulation previously received could affect the results of this study, the participant will not be included 8. Any other contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging or transcranial current stimulation 9. Claustrophobic 10. Metal within the body: 10.1. Pacemaker 10.2. Mechanical heart valve 10.3. Mechanical implant (e.g. aneurysm clip) 10.4. Hip replacement 10.5. Any other pieces of metal that have accidentally entered the body

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The change in neural activity during an attentional control task after sham and active tDCS, assessed using blood oxygenation level dependent-response measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging, taken after each tDCS treatment (sham and active). The time period between each measurement is no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following were measured after active and sham tDCS treatment (the time period between measurements is no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days): 1. Change in accuracy in the attentional control task, assessed by comparing the behavioural test results (accuracy in task) after active and sham tDCS 2. Change in reaction time in the attentional control task, assessed by comparing the behavioural test results (mean reaction time in milliseconds in task) after active and sham tDCS 3. Difference in anxiety symptoms, assessed by the change in self-reported anxiety scores using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) after active and sham tDCS 4. Change in sadness and happiness, assessed by the change in self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) ("sad" indicated by 0 and "happy" indicated by 100) after active and sham tDCS 5. Difference in hostility and friendliness, assessed by the change in self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) ("hostile" indicated by 0 and "friendly" indicated by 100) after active and sham tDCS 6. Difference in calmness/tenseness, assessed by the change in self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) ("calm" indicated by 0 and "tense" indicated by 100) after active and sham tDCS

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactMaria Ironside

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026