Skip to content

The Fistula-In-Ano Trial comparing Surgisis® anal fistula plug versus surgeon's preference (advancement flap, fistulotomy, cutting seton) for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano

Surgisis® anal fistula plug versus surgeon's preference (advancement flap, fistulotomy, cutting seton) for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: a multicentre phase III randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN78352529
Enrollment
306
Registered
2009-10-08
Start date
2011-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High transsphincteric fistula-in-ano Digestive System Fissure and fistula of anal and rectal regions

Interventions

Fistula plug versus surgeon's preference which can be either: 1. Advancement flap 2. Fistulotomy 3. Cutting seton 4. LIFT Procedure (add

Sponsors

University of Leeds (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Clinical diagnosis of high transsphincteric cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano. A high transsphincteric fistula is defined as a fistula involving greater than or equal to 1/3 of the external anal sphincter muscle as assessed by clinical examination or radiological imaging. 2. Patients must have undergone a prior examination under anaesthesia (EUA) to characterise the nature of the fistula 3. The fistula tract should be greater than 2 cm in length 4. Patients must have been treated with a draining seton for a minimum period of 6 weeks prior to randomisation 5. Patients must be 18 years or older, either sex, and able to provide informed consent 6. Fistulae must be cryptoglandular aetiology Added 06/01/2016: 7. Only a single internal fistula opening should be present at EUA, such that the fistula is suitable for treatment by insertion of a single fistula plug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent 2. Contraindication to general anaesthesia 3. Low transsphincteric fistulae involving less than 1/3 of the external anal sphincter 4. Non-cryptoglandular fistulae, e.g. Crohns, obstetric, irradiation, malignant, etc. 5. Other perineal fistulae, e.g. rectovaginal fistulae, pouch-vaginal fistulae, etc. 6. Evidence of active perianal sepsis 7. Cultural or religious objection to the use of pig tissue Added 06/01/2016: 8. Complex disease in which more than one internal fistula opening is present and requiring concurrent insertion of more than one fistula plug 9. Absolute contraindication to MRI scan e.g. cardiac pacemaker 10. Patients with recurrent anal fistulae previously treated with a fistula plug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Symptom-specific quality of life as assessed by the validated Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale and supplemented with collection of generic EQ-5D data and visual analogue scores. Assessments will be at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Fistula healing rate at 12 months 2. Faecal incontinence at baseline, 6 and 12 months 3. Complication rates 4. Re-intervention rates 5. Health resource utilisation 6. Cost-effectiveness

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026