Skip to content

St Mark's double balloon colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy study

St Mark'?s double balloon colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a prospective randomised controlled study designed to assess colonoscopy completion rates, patient comfort at colonoscopy and time taken to complete colonoscopy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN77510548
Enrollment
44
Registered
2011-02-16
Start date
2010-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy Surgery Colonoscopy

Interventions

Patients are randomised to conventional colonoscopy (CC) or double balloon colonoscopy (DBC). The interventions will only involve a single 'routine' colonoscopy and there shall be no trial related fol

Sponsors

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients referred St Mark's endoscopy unit for a colonoscopy who are known to have a colon that is technically challenging to colonoscopy, i.e. failed colonoscopy due to technical difficulties in the past or have had a 'difficult' colonoscopy in the past (as described in a previous colonoscopy report), or who fit one or more of the criteria that predict a technically challenging colonoscopy i.e.: 1. A low body mass index 2. A low waist-to-hip ratio 3. Female gender 4. Over 60 years of age 5. A past surgical history of hysterectomy 6. A longstanding history of constipation and/or haemorrhoids 7. A history of known sigmoid colon disease (e.g. known diverticular disease) 8. The presence of a known long, redundant colon as identified by diagnostic imaging

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with contraindications to conscious sedation 2. Patients with contraindications to colonoscopy 3. Patients with latex allergy (as the balloons on the DBC endoscope are made of latex) 4. Patients who are unwilling to have a colonoscopy or are unwilling to take part in the study 5. Patients lacking capacity to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To determine whether DBC when compared to CC will enable faster caecal intubation in patients known to have or predicted to have colons that are technically challenging to colonoscopy 2. To determine whether DBC when compared to CC will enable a more comfortable colonoscopy experience requiring less sedation in patients known to have or predicted to have colons that are technically challenging to colonoscopy These outcomes will be measured during and immediately after the procedure. There will be no need for follow-up for the purposes of the trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To determine whether DBC when compared to CC will enable a higher caecal intubation rate in patients known to have or predicted to have colons that are technically challenging to colonoscopy. These outcomes will be measured during and immediately after the procedure. There will be no need for follow-up for the purposes of the trial.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026