Skip to content

Minimizing nocebo effects by conditioning with verbal suggestion

Can nocebo effects on itch be modified by a positive expectation induction? A randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN76895197
Enrollment
99
Registered
2016-10-18
Start date
2014-09-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Experimentally induced itch in healthy subjects Signs and Symptoms

Interventions

Participants visit Leiden University once for approximately 4.5 hours. Expectations regarding itch stimuli are induced by conditioning and verbal suggestion procedures with respect to purple and yello

Sponsors

Leiden University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy human volunteers 2. 18 - 35 years old 3. Both male and female 4. Fluent in Dutch language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe morbidity (e.g., multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, heart or lung diseases) 2. Psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression) 3. Use of pacemaker 4. Color blindness 5. Diagnose of histamine hypersensitivity 6. Chronic itch or pain complaints 7. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Level of itching, measured using an NRS score, induced by each electrical stimulus

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Scratching behavior, induced by each electrical stimulus. Scratching behaviour is assessed by videotaping the participants during the experiment. Frequency, duration and localization of scratching behaviour are scored by an experimenter who is blinded for the randomization of groups and colored cues. 2. Level of itching (NRS rating) and scratching behavior induced by histamine iontophoresis

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026