Skip to content

Optimised Patient Transfer using an Innovative Multidisciplinary Assessment in the Canton Aargau (OPTIMA)

Optimised Patient Transfer using an Innovative Multidisciplinary Assessment in the Canton Aargau (OPTIMA) : An observational quality control trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN76703125
Enrollment
450
Registered
2010-02-17
Start date
2009-11-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory tract infections Respiratory

Interventions

Currently, most patients with lower respiratory tract infections, who are seen and evaluated in our Emergency Department, are generally admitted to hospital regardless of medical, nursing and psychoso

Sponsors

Kantonsspital Aarau (Switzerland)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age = 18 years 2. Admission to Emergency Department (ED) of acute care hospital (Kantonsspital Aarau, Klinik Barmelweid) for acute lower respiratory tract infections

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Does not match inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To define the percentage of allocated patients into low, intermediate, high and very high risks based on medical, nursing and psychosocial criteria corresponding to virtual triage into ambulatory, post-peracute care, spa treatment, nurse-led unit or traditional acute hospital care

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Correlation of biomarkers, clinical and nursing scores (separately and in combination) with patients' outcomes (hospital mortality, ICU requirement and severe complications such as empyema, lung abscess, development of acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], persistence or development of pneumonia) and site of care decisions 2. Identification and adaptation of medical, nursing and psychosocial criteria for triage decisions using biomarkers, clinical scores and functionality assessments, patients' and relatives` preferences 3. Testing the usefulness and feasibility of functional status and risk assessment tools as a surrogate marker for nursing requirements for risk-stratification 4. Comparison of the post-acute care discharge score with biomarkers and other clinical and functional assessment tools on day 3 5. External validation of the 5 day-1-items identified as predictive for post-acute care discharge 6. Identification of patients' and relatives' information needs 7. Cost-effectiveness of innovative pathways based on case-based lump sum (Fallpauschale) of entire treatment pathway on patient-level 8. Identification of patients' and families' preferences for site of care 9. Determination of current length of acute hospitalisation 10. Identification of medical and functional/nursing and psychosocial criteria to define stability for timely transfer to home or post-peracute care facilities (spa treatment or immediate post-peracute care in specialized facilities or NLU) 11. Determination of time to stability for transfer to post-peracute care facilities 12. Determination of proportion of patients eligible for pulmonary rehabilitation and time until eligibility

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026