Skip to content

A new dental implant in the aesthetic zone

Clinical and radiographic performance of immediately temporized BLX implants in the aesthetic zone: a retrospective single-cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN76538898
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-02-19
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rehabilitation of a single tooth in the aesthetic zone by means of one implant with immediate restoration Oral Health

Interventions

The missing tooth is replaced with a Straumann BLX in the aesthetic zone. After the healing period, a screw-retained zirconia-based single crown is realized and delivered to the patient. Patients are

Sponsors

ITI International Team for Implantology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. At least 18 years old 2. Systemic health recorded as a ASA 1 or ASA II diagnosis following the definition of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 3. Full mouth bleeding index and full mouth plaque index lower than or equal to 25% at baseline 4. One permanent missing tooth or failing tooth in the anterior zone of either arch 5. Patient desire to have the edentulous site or hopeless tooth treated with a single implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) intact buccal socket wall evaluated at the time of the extraction 6. Adequate bone quantity to place an implant with a diameter of at least 3.5 mm and a length of at least 10 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. General medical (ASA III or IV) and/or psychiatric contraindications to oral surgery 2. Pregnancy or nursing 3. Steroid therapy or bisphosphonate therapy 4. Alcohol or drug abuse 5. Heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes/day) 6. Radiation therapy to head or neck region within 5 years 7. Untreated periodontitis 8. Acute and chronic infections of the adjacent tissues or natural dentition 9. Severe maxillomandibular skeletal discrepancy 10. High and moderate parafunctional activity 11. Absence of opposite teeth 12. Unavailability to attend regular follow-up visits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL) assessed using standardized intraoral digital periapical radiographs with the parallel technique by means of customized periapical radiograph holder (Rinn, DentsplySirona, York, PA, USA) at definitive prosthesis placement (baseline) and after 1 year 2. Implant and prosthetic success measured at 1-year follow-up visit: 2.1. Implant success defined in case of probing depth (PD) <5 mm together with absence of bleeding or suppuration on probing, and a radiographic marginal bone level (MBL) <1.5 mm 2.2. Prosthetic success defined as the presence of the definitive prosthesis with patient satisfaction and without complications including and not limited to fracture/chipping, screw loosening, and prosthesis mobility 3. Implant survival rates defined as the presence of the implant without pain or mobility at any follow-up examination

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Effects of implant location, flap design and implant timing on insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values, recorded by Osstell implant stability recording at implant placement

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026