Skip to content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty versus non-surgical care for acute 3 and 4 part fractures of the proximal humerus in patients aged over 65 years – the PROFHER-2 randomised trial

PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation trial no. 2 (PROFHER-2 trial): a three-arm randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty versus non-surgical care for acute three and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in patients over 65 years of age

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN76296703
Enrollment
380
Registered
2018-04-05
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Three and four part proximal humeral fractures Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Fracture of shoulder and upper arm

Interventions

The clinical care team will assess potential patient eligibility, and a routine x-ray will be taken to confirm a three or four part fracture. Patients who agree to take part will receive one of the th

Sponsors

South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patients aged 65 years or over 2. Radiographically confirmed acute three-part (including surgical neck) or four-part displaced fracture of the proximal humerus (Neer Classification) including head-splitting fractures of the humeral head and fracture dislocations 3. Trial interventions can be provided within 5 weeks of injury 4. Patient is deemed by the clinical care team to be fit for surgery 5. Able to provide full informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are unable to adhere to trial procedures or complete questionnaires 2. Polytrauma – where one or more additional fractures, which may affect the outcome measures for the trial, are present or other body-systems are affected 3. Open fractures or fractures where there is severe soft tissue compromise requiring urgent surgery 4. Pathological (other than osteoporotic) fractures 5. Presence of axillary nerve palsy (given that this results in a weakening of the deltoid muscle, upon which the shoulder relies for function)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain and impairment impact on daily living activities, measured using the Oxford Shoulder Score at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post randomisation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5L at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post randomisation 2. Pain measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post randomisation 3. Pain measured using a visual analogue pain scale at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post randomisation 4. Range of shoulder motion measured at discharge from physiotherapy and independently assessed at 6 months post randomisation (i.e. not by the treating surgeon) 5. Healing and implant position using AP and Axillary (and scapular Y view if available) X-rays taken at 6 months post-surgery 6. Further procedures and complications recorded by clinicians at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post randomisation 7. Grip strength to assess frailty and as a predictor of morbidity and mortality, measured at baseline 8. Physiotherapy requirements and use (including time to start of physiotherapy; number of sessions; modalities used; and duration of rehabilitation) collected during the trial

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactCatherine Arundel
catherine.arundel@york.ac.uk+44 (0)1904321116

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026