Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of prolonged use of aspirin or rivaroxaban after surgery for hip fractures

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of aspirin and rivaroxaban following enoxaparin treatment for prevention of VTE after hip fracture surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN76129839
Enrollment
390
Registered
2019-07-01
Start date
2011-11-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip fracture surgery Circulatory System

Interventions

The patients were divided into the aspirin group and rivaroxaban group according to odd or even number of the end of the registration number. All patients were given enoxaparin subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Hip fracture who were diagnosed by X-ray and/or computed tomography.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Lower extremity DVT confirmed by preoperative ultrasonography 2. History of thromboembolic disease and undergoing anticoagulant therapy 3. Presence of hemorrhagic diseases and/or a major bleeding history 4. Severe liver or kidney diseases 5. Coagulation disorders 6. Allergy to enoxaparin, aspirin, or rivaroxaban 7. Platelet count less than 100*10^9 cells/L

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Adjudicated venous thromboembolism, which was defined as deep vein thrombosis involving the inferior vena cava to popliteal vein or pulmonary embolism. Ultrasonography of the lower extremity vein is a routine examination. All patients had to be examined before and after surgery. Pulmonary embolism was confirmed by computed tomographic pulmonary angiography, when the patient's symptoms are suspected to be a pulmonary embolism. 2. The primary safety outcome was bleeding, including major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, according to Anderson’s criteria. Patients were followed for 90 days regarding venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of health issues in the 90 days following the intervention: 1. Death 2. Myocardial infarction 3. Stroke 4. Wound infection.

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactQiang Huang
cds5120@163.com028-82722252

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 15, 2026