Skip to content

Randomised controlled trial of swab versus tissue sampling for infected diabetic foot ulcers, and comparison of culture versus molecular processing techniques

CODIFI2: Randomised controlled trial of swab versus tissue sampling for infected diabetic foot ulcers, and comparison of culture versus molecular processing techniques

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN74929588
Enrollment
730
Registered
2019-03-05
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic foot ulcer infection Infections and Infestations

Interventions

The trial is a multi-centre, Phase III, open, prospective, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing two sample collection techniques (swab and tissue sampling) in clinically infecte

Sponsors

University of Leeds
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 120 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years of age or older at the time of signing the consent form 2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (according to WHO criteria) 3. Presence of a DFU that is suspected as a mild or moderate soft tissue infection (as per IDSA guidelines) 4. Able and willing to provide informed consent for participation in the study 5. Consent for foot photography

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Index ulcer present for > 2 years 2. Presence of suspected osteomyelitis of the index limb 3. Previous participation in the trial 4. Not expected to comply with the sampling strategies (i.e. has a preference) 5. Not expected to comply with the follow-up schedule 6. In the opinion of the local investigator the participant’s foot infection is too severe to include them in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to Healing of Index Ulcer: Time from randomisation to healing of index ulcer (up to maximum follow-up of 104 weeks). Healing defined as complete epithelialisation, confirmed by a blinded assessor within 3 days after first report of healing; Timepoint(s): End of follow up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Baseline sampling compliance: Binary (Compliant / Not compliant, according to whether sampling at baseline was as randomised), Timepoints: Randomisation 2. Full sampling compliance: Binary (Compliant / Not compliant, according to whether sampling at baseline and all subsequent sampling was as randomised) Timepoints: from randomisation to 52 weeks (to 104 weeks for patients randomised in the first year) or until healing/amputation/withdrawal/death, if observed first 3. Healing status: Binary (Healed / Not healed, according to primary outcome measure definition) at the timepoint. Timepoints: 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 39 weeks, 52 weeks. (and 104 weeks for those randomised in the first year) 4. Antibiotic prescribing over 52/104 weeks: number of days during follow-up where at least one antibiotic agent was prescribed for the foot of the index ulcer. Timepoint: From randomisation to end of follow-up: either date of death/withdrawal/loss to follow-up, or 52 weeks (for later-randomised participants) or 104 weeks (for participants randomised in the first year) 5. Ulcer area (cm-squared) at 4 weeks post randomisation 6. Quality of life, measured using the 6 subscales of the DFS-SF questionnaire derived from the 29 questions of the full questionnaire. Timepoints: 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 39 weeks, 52 weeks, 104 weeks 7. Quality of life, measured using the Utility score obtained from the 5 3-level questions of the EQ5D-3L questionnaire tool. Timepoints: 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 39 weeks, 52 weeks, 104 weeks. 8. Adverse events: counts of number of adverse events relating to diabetic foot ulcer, the sampling technique and antibiotic use. Timepoints: From randomisation to 52 weeks (104 weeks for those randomised in first year) 9. Number of days in hospital: count of number of days admitted related to diabetic foot ulcer over the time at risk (i.e. up to death/withdrawal/loss to follow-up or maximum of 52/104 weeks). Timepoints: From randomisation to either death/withdrawal

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactRachael Gilberts
R.M.Gilberts@leeds.ac.uk+44 (0)113 343 1724

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 22, 2026