Skip to content

A Comparison of Patient Adherence and Preference of Packaging Method for Oral Anticancer Agents Using Conventional Pill Bottles versus Daily Pill Boxes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN74558413
Enrollment
25
Registered
2005-11-15
Start date
2005-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced solid tumors Cancer Solid tumours

Interventions

Daily pill boxes versus conventional pill bottles for packaging

Sponsors

Princess Margaret Hospital (Canada)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients were included in this study if they: 1. Provided informed consent 2. Were capable of reading and writing in English 3. Were greater than 18 years of age with solid tumors 4. Were planned to receive at least 2 consecutive cycles of capecitabine

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients taking other oral anticancer medications such as temozolomide, tamoxifen and arimidex, were not felt to be suitable for the present study since these oral medications are already dispensed in unit dose packages.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient adherence was similiar.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients more satisfied with daily pill boxes than conventional pill bottles.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026