Skip to content

A feasibility study for improving balance in community-dwelling elders using trained volunteers within faith-based institutions

Improving balance in community-dwelling elders using trained volunteers within faith-based institutions: a mixed-methods feasibility study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN74425452
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-09-28
Start date
2018-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of falls in older people who are at risk of falls living in the community Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning

Interventions

The churches that agreed to participate were randomised to either intervention or control by picking from a hat. Intervention group participants received: 1. Education

Sponsors

University of Birmingham
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 65 years or above 2. Able to perform five times sit-to-stand test (Bohannon, 2006) 3. Able to consent 4. Had no falls in the previous 6 months 5. Individuals of either gender 6. Who can walk within their homes 7. With the mental capacity to consent 8. With a self-perceived need to improve their balance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Does not meet the inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility measures: 1. Number of volunteer helpers trained, measured using registers during programme delivery for the 5 weeks 2. Volunteers’ time commitment measured using observation during programme delivery for the 5 weeks 3. Number of sessions run over the project period collected using registers at week 6 and 6 months 4. Recruitment rate recorded as the number of participants who consented to participate at various sites by week 0 (start of the programme at a specific site) 5. Views of participants, volunteers and church leaders about the sustainability of the program and the volunteers’ ability to deliver the programme, collected using focus groups following programme delivery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Dynamic balance measured using timed up and go test at baseline, week 6 and 6 months 2. Dynamic balance measured using five-time sit to stand at baseline, week 6 and 6 months 3. Postural control under various sensory conditions measured using Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (CTSIB-M) at baseline, week 6 and 6 months 4. Static balance measured using single-leg stance test and tandem stance test at baseline, week 6 and 6 months 5. Fear of falling measured by Falls Self-Efficacy Scale questionnaire at baseline, week 6 and 6 months 6. Balance confidence measured using Modified Activity Specific Balance scale questionnaire at baseline, week 6 and 6 months 7. Emotional and social loneliness measured using DeJong Loneliness scale questionnaire at baseline, week 6 and 6 months 8. Rate of falls measured using the number of falls self-reported by participants at 6 months

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactSheeba Rosewilliam
s.b.rosewilliam@bham.ac.uk+44 (0)1214142910

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026